[Pansophy] ER5C-PR-WCA-CPR-PROC

[Valerie Bookwalter]

Christiana,

I misunderstood what Allen was asking me (my fault for trying to multi-task).
You are correct. Perhaps, since this is a procedure, and not a traveler, we can use the "PROC" for processing as the work center and not add an action at the end.
So the procedure would be:

ER5C-PR-PROC-CPR-R1

Would that work for everyone?

Valerie


________________________________
From: Pansophy on behalf of Christiana Wilson via Pansophy
Sent: Friday, May 2, 2025 4:04 PM
To: Allen Samuels; Kirk Davis
Cc: pansophy
Subject: Re: [Pansophy] ER5C-PR-WCA-CPR-PROC

Hi Allen,
The intention is to document all of the steps in one list. Maybe this could be considered a master procedure?  I understand your issue and I hope you understand mine.
Christiana
________________________________
From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>
Sent: Friday, May 2, 2025 11:13 AM
To: Christiana Wilson <grenoble at jlab.org>; Kirk Davis <kdavis at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: ER5C-PR-WCA-CPR-PROC

Good morning, all,

I'm reviewing the ER5C Pair Processing Steps Procedure. It's almost ready to go out for approvals, but it needs a WCA in the ID. I understand that this procedure details steps throughout the test lab, but one is still needed. You can find our up to date list here on pansophy<https://pansophy.jlab.org/pansophy/Travelers/UserTools/dAcronyms.cfm>.
Unless there are further edits needed to the procedure, we can forgo adding it back into ready for approvals after we find the WCA. Just let me know what to put in and I'll route for approvals.

Allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20250502/c782c568/attachment.htm>