[Pansophy] ER5C-VTA-CPR-VTRF

[Allen Samuels]

Christiana,

We can do that. I'm about to go to lunch, but is there a time this afternoon that would work for you?

Allen
________________________________
From: Christiana Wilson <grenoble at jlab.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 2, 2025 10:05 AM
To: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: ER5C-VTA-CPR-VTRF

Can we meet on teams to correct it?
________________________________
From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2025 1:56 PM
To: Christiana Wilson <grenoble at jlab.org>
Cc: Matt Weaks <weaksmc at jlab.org>; pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: ER5C-VTA-CPR-VTRF

Christiana,

I was reviewing ER5C-VTA-CPR-VTRF-R8 and I need to send it back to you. It's labeled as an R8, but the revision number in the traveler is R7 and we don't have a revision note for it.

I also had some comments on the references, in particular C75-PR-CPR-VTRF-R4<https://jlabdoc.jlab.org/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-272511/C75-PR-CPR-VTRF-R4.pdf> and Excel macro for C75-CPR-VTRF<https://jlabdoc.jlab.org/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-254362/VTRF_Data_Processing_Spreadshet_Templete.xlsm>. The references are from the C75 days and are on the older side; as evidenced by the procedure being past the listed periodic review date. While we no longer use periodic review dates for project specific procedures, it is recommended that these documents be reviewed to make sure they are still up to date. At the very least, we would highly recommend them to be renamed to ER5C documents and copied over to the current procedure template. As a reminder, we can
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20251002/852e1c56/attachment.htm>