[Pansophy] C100R Acceptance Criteria

[Allen Samuels]

Michelle,

Good to hear! Thanks for clearing that up.

Allen
________________________________
From: Michelle Oast <weinmann at jlab.org>
Sent: Monday, October 6, 2025 3:51 PM
To: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>; Michael Drury <drury at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>; John Fischer <fischer at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: C100R Acceptance Criteria

Hi Allen,
The most recent revision is the one currently in approvals now.  I got the okay from both Mikes, Peter, Kirk, etc that it's good to go.
Thanks,
Michelle
________________________________
From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>
Sent: Monday, October 6, 2025 3:50 PM
To: Michelle Oast <weinmann at jlab.org>; Michael Drury <drury at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>; John Fischer <fischer at jlab.org>
Subject: C100R Acceptance Criteria

Michelle and Mike,

I was making the rounds with approvals and was talking to John Fischer about the C100R Acceptance Criteria document. He mentioned that he'd heard it was under revision and that was why he hadn't signed yet. I hadn't heard that, and was wondering if you could comment.

Allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20251006/1ad19509/attachment.htm>