<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Feel free to edit (put changes in a different color plz)<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I have generated a new report that shows the cavity specifications for HE. I know that the cavities listed in the report already are refurbished cavities that are coming from the L2PRD project and that some have been renamed with a preceding
“HE-“. This is causing some concern for me with traceability and with the new cavities that will come in, with I imagine the same “HE-“ and the cavities numbers starting at 001. With this, we will run into duplicate names (HE-040 as the cavity from L2PRD and
HE-040 as the new cavity for L2HE). I know that the HE was added for the planning meetings but I also know that the cavities from L2PRD are inscribed as “0040”. Changing the name to something different from what is inscribed on the component will cause confusion
in other work centers (chemistry, assembly, etc), as that will not match what is in the dropdown.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">As some may recall, we ran into some issues with traceability towards the end of L2PRD. We should maintain the same serial number that a component has been named throughout the 2 projects, so in the future, or present, when datamining is
needed to see what processes the cavity has gone through, we have some sort of continuity between projects, especially when using the Serial Number Search which will show every traveler a cavity has been selected in, even across multiple projects.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I am proposing that the cavities that are from L2PRD, that have been renamed only in the database, should have the serial number dropdowns in the database match what is inscribed on the cavity to maintain traceability of that cavity and
to avoid any future duplicate names or confusion.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Megan McDonald<o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Office – (757) 269-7641<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Cell – (757) 234-1604<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>