<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Danny, Chris – Could you please look at the procedures that C100R-CAV-ASSY2 references and let me know which ones are ok as-is (meaning that we could just convert them to the new format without changes to the
work steps) and which ones need to have the work steps revised? I’ve attached the referenced procedures to this email.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Tiffany Ganey<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> Allen Samuels <samuels@jlab.org> <br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, September 7, 2022 12:09 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Tiffany Ganey <ganey@jlab.org><br>
<b>Cc:</b> pansophy <pansophy@jlab.org><br>
<b>Subject:</b> C100R-CAV-ASSY2 Procedures<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Tiffany,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I was reviewing your C100R-CAV-ASSY2-R2 for approvals. It looks good, except for the references. I noticed that all three procedures outdated, with some dating as far back as 12 years. With periodic reviews in place, we should get these
procedures updated. <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I did a bit of poking around, and we have an <a href="https://jlabdoc.jlab.org/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-251183/SRF-MSPR-CLNRM-LEAK-R1.pdf">
SRF-MSPR-CLNRM-LEAK</a> that should cover the RGA Leak Test Procedure. As for the others, there may be up to date procedures in other projects that would apply (at which point we should consider making them Master procedures); or I could pull the info from
the old versions into a new procedure, send them to you for editing, and then get them approved. How would you like to proceed?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Allen<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>