<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">No<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> Pansophy <pansophy-bounces@mailman.jlab.org> <b>
On Behalf Of </b>Mike Drury via Pansophy<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, January 25, 2023 11:38 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Allen Samuels <samuels@jlab.org><br>
<b>Cc:</b> Mike McCaughan <michaelm@jlab.org>; pansophy@jlab.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Pansophy] C100R-CMTF-CM-ACTS-R2<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Step 39 is indeed necessary.<br>
Does fixing the numbering require another approval cycle?<br>
Mike<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 1/25/2023 11:32 AM, Allen Samuels wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal">Mike,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">C100R-CMTF-CM-ACTS-R2 has been approved, but Mike McCaughan brought something up in an approval comment that I wanted to ask about. He said
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="text-indent:.5in">“Numbering of steps missed a block on page 4 between steps 11/12; revise present step 13 for corrected numbering.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="text-indent:.5in">Is step 39 on page 14 necessary? In order to conduct the test it is implicit that facility has a present/valid PSS static and functional certification which wrings all of this out of the system.”<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>Are these changes that need to be made? Does this traveler need to be put on pause to discuss?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p>Allen<o:p></o:p></p>
<p> <o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>