<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"> P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} </style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="elementToProof">
Sounds good. Let's do it!</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="elementToProof">
Mike M<br>
</div>
<div id="appendonsend"></div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> Allen Samuels <samuels@jlab.org><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, January 25, 2023 11:44 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Michael Drury <drury@jlab.org><br>
<b>Cc:</b> Mike McCaughan <michaelm@jlab.org>; pansophy@jlab.org <pansophy@jlab.org><br>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: C100R-CMTF-CM-ACTS-R2</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<style>
<!--
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math"}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri}
p.x_MsoNormal, li.x_MsoNormal, div.x_MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif}
a:link, span.x_MsoHyperlink
{color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline}
a:visited, span.x_MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline}
p.x_msonormal0, li.x_msonormal0, div.x_msonormal0
{margin-right:0in;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif}
span.x_EmailStyle18
{font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext}
span.x_EmailStyle20
{font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext}
.x_MsoChpDefault
{font-size:10.0pt}
@page WordSection1
{margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in}
div.x_WordSection1
{}
-->
</style>
<div lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72">
<div class="x_WordSection1">
<p class="x_MsoNormal">It’s small enough that I don’t think so. If step 39 needed to be removed I would reroute. As long as Mike McCaughan is in agreement now I think we’re good, and the traveler can start the upload process as soon once the step numbers are
fixed.</p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal">Allen</p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<div style="border:none; border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt; padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> Mike Drury <drury@jlab.org> <br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, January 25, 2023 11:38 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Allen Samuels <samuels@jlab.org><br>
<b>Cc:</b> Mike McCaughan <michaelm@jlab.org>; pansophy@jlab.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: C100R-CMTF-CM-ACTS-R2</p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Step 39 is indeed necessary.<br>
Does fixing the numbering require another approval cycle?<br>
Mike<br>
<br>
</p>
<div>
<p class="x_MsoNormal">On 1/25/2023 11:32 AM, Allen Samuels wrote:</p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt; margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="x_MsoNormal">Mike,</p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal">C100R-CMTF-CM-ACTS-R2 has been approved, but Mike McCaughan brought something up in an approval comment that I wanted to ask about. He said
</p>
<p style="text-indent:.5in">“Numbering of steps missed a block on page 4 between steps 11/12; revise present step 13 for corrected numbering.</p>
<p style="text-indent:.5in">Is step 39 on page 14 necessary? In order to conduct the test it is implicit that facility has a present/valid PSS static and functional certification which wrings all of this out of the system.”</p>
<p>Are these changes that need to be made? Does this traveler need to be put on pause to discuss?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Allen</p>
<p> </p>
</blockquote>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>