[PRad] [EXTERNAL] TAC/ITAC responses

Eugene Pasyuk pasyuk at jlab.org
Fri Jul 9 14:07:18 EDT 2021


I agree, however it depends on how many channels we readout.

-Eugene

From: Valery Kubarovsky <vpk at jlab.org>
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2021 13:57
To: Eugene Pasyuk <pasyuk at jlab.org>; gasparan at jlab.org
Cc: Sergey Boyarinov <boiarino at jlab.org>; prad <prad at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: [PRad] [EXTERNAL] TAC/ITAC responses

I have already wrote to Ashot that
CLAS12 and HPS DAQ read out full wave form with 25 kHz trigger rate and 95% live time.


________________________________
From: PRad <prad-bounces at jlab.org<mailto:prad-bounces at jlab.org>> on behalf of Eugene Pasyuk <pasyuk at jlab.org<mailto:pasyuk at jlab.org>>
Sent: Friday, July 9, 2021 13:54
To: gasparan at jlab.org<mailto:gasparan at jlab.org> <gasparan at jlab.org<mailto:gasparan at jlab.org>>
Cc: Sergey Boyarinov <boiarino at jlab.org<mailto:boiarino at jlab.org>>; prad <prad at jlab.org<mailto:prad at jlab.org>>
Subject: Re: [PRad] [EXTERNAL] TAC/ITAC responses

This is  question to Sergey. It might be possible. We right now use bit packing algorithm developed by Gagik to compress FADC data to have full waveform recorded.

-Eugene

> -----Original Message-----
> From: gasparan at jlab.org<mailto:gasparan at jlab.org> <gasparan at jlab.org<mailto:gasparan at jlab.org>>
> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2021 13:47
> To: Eugene Pasyuk <pasyuk at jlab.org<mailto:pasyuk at jlab.org>>
> Cc: Dutta, Dipangkar <d.dutta at msstate.edu<mailto:d.dutta at msstate.edu>>; prad <prad at jlab.org<mailto:prad at jlab.org>>
> Subject: Re: [PRad] [EXTERNAL] TAC/ITAC responses
>
>
>   Hi Eugene,
>
>  Good comment, we will include it in the Answer.
>
>  Question to you: what do you think about the statement:
>  "... The DAQ will not be able to read out full wave forms at a trigger rate of
> 25kHz...."
>
>  Is our answer there correct?
>
>  Ashot
>
>
> > Additio to answer #7:
> > The main reason of the poor vacuum upstream of the target was a leaky
> > window of the tagger vacuum chamber. This window will be replaced and
> > extra pumps added.
> >
> > -Eugene
> >
> > From: PRad <prad-bounces at jlab.org<mailto:prad-bounces at jlab.org>> On Behalf Of Dipangkar Dutta
> > Sent: Friday, July 09, 2021 11:31
> > To: prad <prad at jlab.org<mailto:prad at jlab.org>>
> > Subject: [PRad] [EXTERNAL] TAC/ITAC responses
> >
> > Hi All,
> > Attached is our response to TAC/ITAC questions that we will review
> > during the meeting today.
> > Cheers
> > Dipangkar
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > PRad mailing list
> > PRad at jlab.org<mailto:PRad at jlab.org>
> > https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/prad
> >
>


_______________________________________________
PRad mailing list
PRad at jlab.org<mailto:PRad at jlab.org>
https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/prad
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/prad/attachments/20210709/d195cec4/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the PRad mailing list