[PRad] [EXTERNAL] TAC/ITAC responses

[gasparan at jlab.org]

  Thank you Sergey,

 That is all I needed.

 Ashot

> Ashot, we can run with full waveform or without it, whatever needed. Event
> rate 25kHz is not a problem.
>
> ________________________________
> From: gasparan at jlab.org <gasparan at jlab.org>
> Sent: Friday, July 9, 2021 2:42 PM
> To: Eugene Pasyuk <pasyuk at jlab.org>
> Cc: Valery Kubarovsky <vpk at jlab.org>; gasparan at jlab.org
> <gasparan at jlab.org>; Sergey Boyarinov <boiarino at jlab.org>; prad
> <prad at jlab.org>
> Subject: RE: [PRad] [EXTERNAL] TAC/ITAC responses
>
>
>   well that nimber suppose to be known: ~1000 PbWO4 channels plus 2 GEMs
>  with 70x70 cm^2 size, and that is all!
>
>  Ashot
>
>
>> I agree, however it depends on how many channels we readout.
>>
>> -Eugene
>>
>> From: Valery Kubarovsky <vpk at jlab.org>
>> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2021 13:57
>> To: Eugene Pasyuk <pasyuk at jlab.org>; gasparan at jlab.org
>> Cc: Sergey Boyarinov <boiarino at jlab.org>; prad <prad at jlab.org>
>> Subject: Re: [PRad] [EXTERNAL] TAC/ITAC responses
>>
>> I have already wrote to Ashot that
>> CLAS12 and HPS DAQ read out full wave form with 25 kHz trigger rate and
>> 95% live time.
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: PRad <prad-bounces at jlab.org<mailto:prad-bounces at jlab.org>> on
>> behalf
>> of Eugene Pasyuk <pasyuk at jlab.org<mailto:pasyuk at jlab.org>>
>> Sent: Friday, July 9, 2021 13:54
>> To: gasparan at jlab.org<mailto:gasparan at jlab.org>
>> <gasparan at jlab.org<mailto:gasparan at jlab.org>>
>> Cc: Sergey Boyarinov <boiarino at jlab.org<mailto:boiarino at jlab.org>>; prad
>> <prad at jlab.org<mailto:prad at jlab.org>>
>> Subject: Re: [PRad] [EXTERNAL] TAC/ITAC responses
>>
>> This is  question to Sergey. It might be possible. We right now use bit
>> packing algorithm developed by Gagik to compress FADC data to have full
>> waveform recorded.
>>
>> -Eugene
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: gasparan at jlab.org<mailto:gasparan at jlab.org>
>>> <gasparan at jlab.org<mailto:gasparan at jlab.org>>
>>> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2021 13:47
>>> To: Eugene Pasyuk <pasyuk at jlab.org<mailto:pasyuk at jlab.org>>
>>> Cc: Dutta, Dipangkar <d.dutta at msstate.edu<mailto:d.dutta at msstate.edu>>;
>>> prad <prad at jlab.org<mailto:prad at jlab.org>>
>>> Subject: Re: [PRad] [EXTERNAL] TAC/ITAC responses
>>>
>>>
>>>   Hi Eugene,
>>>
>>>  Good comment, we will include it in the Answer.
>>>
>>>  Question to you: what do you think about the statement:
>>>  "... The DAQ will not be able to read out full wave forms at a trigger
>>> rate of
>>> 25kHz...."
>>>
>>>  Is our answer there correct?
>>>
>>>  Ashot
>>>
>>>
>>> > Additio to answer #7:
>>> > The main reason of the poor vacuum upstream of the target was a leaky
>>> > window of the tagger vacuum chamber. This window will be replaced and
>>> > extra pumps added.
>>> >
>>> > -Eugene
>>> >
>>> > From: PRad <prad-bounces at jlab.org<mailto:prad-bounces at jlab.org>> On
>>> Behalf Of Dipangkar Dutta
>>> > Sent: Friday, July 09, 2021 11:31
>>> > To: prad <prad at jlab.org<mailto:prad at jlab.org>>
>>> > Subject: [PRad] [EXTERNAL] TAC/ITAC responses
>>> >
>>> > Hi All,
>>> > Attached is our response to TAC/ITAC questions that we will review
>>> > during the meeting today.
>>> > Cheers
>>> > Dipangkar
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > PRad mailing list
>>> > PRad at jlab.org<mailto:PRad at jlab.org>
>>> > https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/prad
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PRad mailing list
>> PRad at jlab.org<mailto:PRad at jlab.org>
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/prad
>>
>
>
>