[PRad] [EXTERNAL] Re: A new exclusion limit

Tyler Hague tjhague at lbl.gov
Sat Jul 29 12:59:16 EDT 2023

Hi Rafo,

Thanks for sending this around. It looks like their exclusion limit fully
contains our experiment. Our experiment should still be considered
complementary though given that we are not using a missing mass method. It
may be useful for us to consider putting more emphasis on our sensitivity
to neutrals though, given this.


On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 8:46 AM Rafayel Paremuzyan via PRad <prad at jlab.org>

> Hello all,
> here is the new paper (still in the Arxiv) that reports a huge new
> exclusion limit
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__arxiv.org_abs_2307.02404&d=DwIFaQ&c=CJqEzB1piLOyyvZjb8YUQw&r=V3XNY-MaMKN2LuAaTdObrA&m=x2bMrJPaejtL1A51Aa2oTfUgvz5gnahquKbAc9WK0qXvLBQPBM2MHB9qOfStiy0Z&s=twYxTFu6fruNUbMpY5EhjpSXc2Si-3WYYyi3yUyHrQ0&e= 
> Rafo
> _______________________________________________
> PRad mailing list
> PRad at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/prad
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/prad/attachments/20230729/4bfd3eb4/attachment.html>

More information about the PRad mailing list