[PRad] [EXTERNAL] Re: A new exclusion limit

[Tyler Hague]

Hi Rafo,

Thanks for sending this around. It looks like their exclusion limit fully
contains our experiment. Our experiment should still be considered
complementary though given that we are not using a missing mass method. It
may be useful for us to consider putting more emphasis on our sensitivity
to neutrals though, given this.

Best,
Tyler

On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 8:46 AM Rafayel Paremuzyan via PRad <prad at jlab.org>
wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> here is the new paper (still in the Arxiv) that reports a huge new
> exclusion limit
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__arxiv.org_abs_2307.02404&d=DwIFaQ&c=CJqEzB1piLOyyvZjb8YUQw&r=V3XNY-MaMKN2LuAaTdObrA&m=x2bMrJPaejtL1A51Aa2oTfUgvz5gnahquKbAc9WK0qXvLBQPBM2MHB9qOfStiy0Z&s=twYxTFu6fruNUbMpY5EhjpSXc2Si-3WYYyi3yUyHrQ0&e= 
>
> Rafo
> _______________________________________________
> PRad mailing list
> PRad at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/prad
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/prad/attachments/20230729/4bfd3eb4/attachment.html>