[Primexd] [New Comment] Follow-up Re: Follow-up Re: error in translation table for TAGM column 21

[somov at jlab.org]

Comments:
--
 - by somov on Thu, 12/12/2019 - 19:46.

Translation Table  - The translation table /Translation/DAQ2detector was overwritten in the beginning of December 2019, 
see below


create         jrsteven         2019-12-03 13-12-36    Created assignment '/Translation/DAQ2detector:60000:default:2019-12-03_13-12-36



As a result, the CCAL table was corrupted for the PrimEx run period, see some differences between the old and 
new table below (the data is Ok, the CCAL reconstruction didn't work properly if you run it after 12/03/19, fixed now)
(I will also update the run period 70000+ when we understand TAGM cabling)

I restored the table and going to check  it. The TAGM was restored according to the PrimEx run period, for
consistency (we need to debug and correct swapped DSC/TDC cables though).



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When you update CCDB tables, please check and modify only sections relevant to you
(using diff is not a bad idea to compare versions).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



.............................

<       <channel number="0" detector="CCAL" col="-6" row="5"/>
<       <channel number="1" detector="CCAL" col="-1" row="-6"/>
<       <channel number="2" detector="CCAL" col="-2" row="-6"/>
<       <channel number="3" detector="CCAL" col="-3" row="-6"/>
<       <channel number="4" detector="CCAL" col="-4" row="-6"/>
<       <channel number="5" detector="CCAL" col="-5" row="-6"/>
<       <channel number="6" detector="CCAL" col="-6" row="-6"/>
<       <channel number="7" detector="CCAL" col="-6" row="-1"/>
<       <channel number="8" detector="CCAL" col="-6" row="-2"/>
<       <channel number="9" detector="CCAL" col="-6" row="-3"/>
<       <channel number="10" detector="CCAL" col="-6" row="-4"/>
<       <channel number="11" detector="CCAL" col="-6" row="-5"/>
---
>       <channel number="0" detector="CCAL" row="5" col="-6"/>
>       <channel number="1" detector="CCAL" row="-6" col="-1"/>
>       <channel number="2" detector="CCAL" row="-6" col="-2"/>
>       <channel number="3" detector="CCAL" row="-6" col="-3"/>
>       <channel number="4" detector="CCAL" row="-6" col="-4"/>
>       <channel number="5" detector="CCAL" row="-6" col="-5"/>
>       <channel number="6" detector="CCAL" row="-6" col="-6"/>
>       <channel number="7" detector="CCAL" row="-1" col="-6"/>
>       <channel number="8" detector="CCAL" row="-2" col="-6"/>
>       <channel number="9" detector="CCAL" row="-3" col="-6"/>
>       <channel number="10" detector="CCAL" row="-4" col="-6"/>
>       <channel number="11" detector="CCAL" row="-5" col="-6"/>






  


 

--

Logentry Text:
--
<p>Here is a diff between a current (tt_bad) and what it would look like corrected (tt_good). The line numbers might be off, as I am comparing what existed back in February before and after the change that introduced the mutation. That is, you want to comment out the line where col="21" is assigned for the DISCIM and F1TDC sections, then uncomment the line where is should be assigned in each section. The correct value is there, but it is commented out. Apparently before the "fix the dup" correction, both entries were uncommented in the tt, which prompted David to try and fix it. Problem was, he commented out the wrong one.</p><p>[jonesrt at gluey TranslationTable]$ diff tt_bad.xml tt_good.xml</p><p>24712c24712</p><p><       <channel number="8" detector="TAGM" col="21" row="0"/></p><p>---</p><p>>       <!--channel number="8" detector="TAGM" col="21" row="0"/--></p><p>24823c24823</p><p><       <!-!
 -channel number="11" detector="TAGM" col="21" row="0"/--></p><p>---</p><p>>       <channel number="11" detector="TAGM" col="21" row="0"/></p><p>25394c25394</p><p><       <channel number="23" detector="TAGM" col="21" row="0"/></p><p>---</p><p>>       <!--channel number="23" detector="TAGM" col="21" row="0"/--></p><p>25499c25499</p><p><       <!--channel number="26" detector="TAGM" col="21" row="0"/--></p><p>---</p><p>>       <channel number="26" detector="TAGM" col="21" row="0"/></p>

---

This is a plain text email for clients that cannot display HTML.  The full logentry can be found online at https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3752314
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/primexd/attachments/20191212/ad5b3f42/attachment.html>