[Pwg] PAC Theory and Technical Review for Ae+e- Proposal (PR21-12-006)

[Xiaochao Zheng]

Dear Andrei:

I agree with what you said about the theory review. It reminded me of one of the PVDIS manuscript reviews that we received in 2013 (and I still have it stored in my laptop).

Of course, it does not mean there is no challenge in theory and I am working on one of the details this month. For this week, however, I will have to focus on the technical challenges and answer questions for something that has not been built.

Have a Happy July 4th!

Xiaochao
________________________________
From: Andrei Afanasev <afanas at jlab.org>
Sent: Friday, July 2, 2021 8:19 PM
To: Xiaochao Zheng <xiaochao at jlab.org>
Cc: pwg <pwg at jlab.org>; solid at jlab.org <solid at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: [Pwg] PAC Theory and Technical Review for Ae+e- Proposal (PR21-12-006)

Dear Xiaochao, as far as theory is concerned, I think the review is very positive. What else can we say in addition to “thank you”?

Regards, Andrei

----------------
Andrei Afanasev, Professor
The George Washington University
Washington, DC

On Jul 2, 2021, at 8:02 PM, Xiaochao Zheng <xiaochao at jlab.org> wrote:


Dear All:

We received the theory and technical reviews for the Ae+e- proposal today, please see attached.

I will be drafting a point-by-point reply within the week and send it to the two PAC readers (Steven Dytman and Shufang Su) of our proposal.  Please let me know by email if you would like to join the effort of drafting the reply.

Cheers,

Xiaochao
<PR12-21-006_TAC_THY.pdf>
<PR12-21-006_TAC_PHY.pdf>
_______________________________________________
Pwg mailing list
Pwg at jlab.org
https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pwg/attachments/20210703/1ec2c63e/attachment.html>