<html><body><div style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000"><div><style style="display:none">/*<![CDATA[*/P {
margin-top: 0;
margin-bottom: 0;
}
/*]]>*</style></div><hr id="zwchr" data-marker="__DIVIDER__"><div><b>De: </b>"Paul E. Reimer" <reimer@anl.gov><br></div><div data-marker="__HEADERS__"><b>À: </b>"pwg" <pwg@jlab.org><br><b>Envoyé: </b>Vendredi 9 Juillet 2021 19:00:55<br><b>Objet: </b>[EXTERNAL] Re: [Pwg] Reader 1 PR12-21-006 review<br></div><div><br></div><div data-marker="__QUOTED_TEXT__"><p>Hello Xiaochao,</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>I think that for question 4, "Why was this chosen to be first?" is simply that it was not chosen, but that we (you) felt that the ideas were developed enough to submit as a proposal to the PAC. The timing of the submission of the other positron experiments
us up to their proponents.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>For question 4, it almost sounds as if there is a misunderstanding of the experiment. I think that he was looking for a way to cross check the relative e<sup>+</sup> to e<sup>-</sup> normalizations with some "common" measurement, but clearly DIS can't be
the cross check.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Paul<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature">--
If you receive this e-mail after hours, during a weekend, or on a holiday,
please enjoy your time off and respond during your working hours.
Paul E Reimer +1-630-252-4037 (Office)
Bldg 203, Physics Division +1-630-252-3903 (fax)
Argonne National Laboratory +1-630-344-9207 (mobile)
9700 S Cass Ave <a href="mailto:reimer@anl.gov" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">reimer@anl.gov</a>
Lemont, IL 60439 USA. he/his/him</pre>
<div>On 7/9/21 10:40, Xiaochao Zheng wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote>
<div style="font-family:'calibri' , 'arial' , 'helvetica' , sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb( 0 , 0 , 0 )">
Dear All:</div>
<div style="font-family:'calibri' , 'arial' , 'helvetica' , sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb( 0 , 0 , 0 )">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:'calibri' , 'arial' , 'helvetica' , sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb( 0 , 0 , 0 )">
We received some questions and comments from Steven Dytman on the proposal, please see his email below. (Shufang Su is the 2nd reader and we may receive more questions from her later).</div>
<div style="font-family:'calibri' , 'arial' , 'helvetica' , sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb( 0 , 0 , 0 )">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:'calibri' , 'arial' , 'helvetica' , sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb( 0 , 0 , 0 )">
To the positron team (Joe, Yves, Jay, et al): could you please provide some insights to 1b and 1c?</div>
<div style="font-family:'calibri' , 'arial' , 'helvetica' , sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb( 0 , 0 , 0 )">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:'calibri' , 'arial' , 'helvetica' , sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb( 0 , 0 , 0 )">
To my theory colleagues: any suggestion on 2? (I can probably make a draft sketch on its answer. And I may also expand the last theory update in my other 4-page PDF answer to theory/tech comments).<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:'calibri' , 'arial' , 'helvetica' , sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb( 0 , 0 , 0 )">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:'calibri' , 'arial' , 'helvetica' , sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb( 0 , 0 , 0 )">
I think I can answer 5, but suggestions are welcome.</div>
<div style="font-family:'calibri' , 'arial' , 'helvetica' , sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb( 0 , 0 , 0 )">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:'calibri' , 'arial' , 'helvetica' , sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb( 0 , 0 , 0 )">
I am not sure I understand 3 and 4.. Any ideas? I think since both e- and e+ are secondary beams, we can't use polarized e-, so we can only do "unpolarized DIS measurement" but I can't figure out how to use it as a "cross check".<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:'calibri' , 'arial' , 'helvetica' , sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb( 0 , 0 , 0 )">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:'calibri' , 'arial' , 'helvetica' , sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb( 0 , 0 , 0 )">
I hope to draft a full answer over the weekend and send it back to our readers by Tuesday next week.<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:'calibri' , 'arial' , 'helvetica' , sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb( 0 , 0 , 0 )">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:'calibri' , 'arial' , 'helvetica' , sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb( 0 , 0 , 0 )">
Best regards,<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:'calibri' , 'arial' , 'helvetica' , sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb( 0 , 0 , 0 )">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:'calibri' , 'arial' , 'helvetica' , sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb( 0 , 0 , 0 )">
Xiaochao<br>
</div>
<div>
<div style="font-family:'calibri' , 'arial' , 'helvetica' , sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb( 0 , 0 , 0 )">
<br>
</div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%">
<div dir="ltr"><span data-mce-style="font-size: 11pt; color: #000000; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" style="font-size: 11pt; color: #000000; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> Steven Dytman
<a href="mailto:dytman@pitt.edu" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"><dytman@pitt.edu></a><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, July 9, 2021 11:26 AM<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [EXTERNAL] PR12-21-006 review</span>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div><span data-mce-style="font-size: small;" style="font-size: small;" size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt">
</span></span><div>Xiaochao,<br>
I hope I have your name correct. Here are my questions on your proposal.<br>
<br>
1. The main issue is the positron beam.<br>
a. What parameters are most important properties to control, how well?<br>
b. Proposal emphasizes importance of *equality* of beam energies. <br>
Is this a strong limitation on the lab? TAC report also mentions this. <br>
What if the consistency was 50% worse than you request? What is your <br>
estimate of how much the systematic errors would increase?<br>
c. What is earliest time you plan to have a suitable e+ beam for <br>
your experiment?<br>
d. What is the maximum time separation between e+ and e- beam <br>
running you seek?<br>
<br>
2. Since DIS has no sharp signal, backgrounds must be calculated (high <br>
twist, radiative corrections seem most difficult). How will those be <br>
controlled?<br>
<br>
3. Will you do unpolarized or single polarized DIS measurements as a <br>
cross-check?<br>
<br>
4. How does this relate to other positron experiments? Why was this <br>
chosen to be first?<br>
<br>
5. What are the differences between your proposal and the existing CERN <br>
measurement? I think that comes from the fact that their beam was <br>
polarized and yours will be unpolarized.<br>
<br>
regards,<br>
Steve<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre">_______________________________________________
Pwg mailing list
<a href="mailto:Pwg@jlab.org" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">Pwg@jlab.org</a>
<a href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg</a>
</pre>
</blockquote><br></div></div></body></html>