[Qweak_transverse_prl_comments] Fwd: [Q-weak] First draft of the Qweak elastic transverse asymmetry paper

[Buddhini Waidyawansa]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Buddhini Waidyawansa <buddhini at jlab.org>
Date: Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 4:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Q-weak] First draft of the Qweak elastic transverse asymmetry
paper
To: Dave Mack <mack at jlab.org>


Hi Dave
Table 1 doesn't have polarization correction. There I just wanted to show
what I get from the 3 fits. I guess I can divide by P since I am using the
average polarization. But then when I talk about the average of the three
asymmetries later and divide that by P, I wonder if it would confuse the
reader's.
Dave G and i did check the effect on the final result when we divide the
measured asymmetry by p before averaging and after averaging. The change in
the central value was less than a percent. Its in my technote.
One thing you may not find in my data release talk and tech note is the
beamline background correction analysis. You can find that technote in doc
db. When I did my data release talk I did not include the beamline
background or the soft neutral background dilutions.

Thanks for checking my analysis and numbers. I know Paul is too busy to
check it.  Even though I am confident in what I did, having another set of
eyes on the analysis always helps!




-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Buddhini Waidyawansa
Postdoctoral Fellow
C122,
12000 Jefferson Ave,
Newport News, VA 23602.
TP 757-912-0410
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/qweak_transverse_prl_comments/attachments/20141111/00fa074a/attachment-0001.html