[Rga_calib] RGA Runs to calibrate

[Raffaella De Vita]

Dear Annalisa,
Since Nick said jobs there are no jobs running, Updated the RG-K range right now.
Best regards,
	Raffaella

> On 14 Aug 2019, at 23:04, Annalisa D'Angelo <annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it> wrote:
> 
> Dear Nick and Raffaella,
> 
> please proceed with the change in the RG-K range to 4.008 ns.
> 
> I understood that Nick was going to cook two runs close to 5700 for FT calibration. I would only make sure that the two actions do not interfere..
> 
> Than you
> 
> Annalisa
> 
> Il 14/08/19 21:25, markov ha scritto:
>> Dear Raffaella,
>> there is no ongoing cooking for the RG K (which I know of).
>> Nick.
>>> On Aug 14, 2019, at 2:51 PM, Raffaella De Vita <Raffaella.Devita at ge.infn.it> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear Nick,
>>> I think RG-K should use 4.008 ns as well. If this change doesn’t impact RG-K cooking that may be on going, I could proceed to load the new period for both RG-A and K. I’ve cc’ed Annalisa for comments.
>>> Best regards,
>>> 	Raffaella
>>> 
>>>> On 14 Aug 2019, at 19:39, markov <markov at jlab.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Dear all,
>>>> right now there is no cooking for the RGA going on (expect for that 66 runs for the DNP, but for them it is already).
>>>> P.S. there were some questions regarding RG K RF period. Do we want it to set to 4.008 ns as well?
>>>> Nick.
>>>>> On Aug 14, 2019, at 1:33 PM, Raffaella De Vita <Raffaella.Devita at ge.infn.it> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Dear Latifa,
>>>>> If it is not interfering with ongoing cooking, I can do it today. I would just need to know the run ranges.
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> 	Raffaella
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 14 Aug 2019, at 18:00, Latifa Elouadrhiri <latifa at jlab.org> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Dear Raffaella,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> If you could that that would be great. or you send us instructions.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Latifa
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 8/14/19 11:35 AM, Raffaella De Vita wrote:
>>>>>>> Dear Latifa,
>>>>>>> Before moving to the next stage of calibration for these new runs and related ranges, it will be necessary to update the RF period in ccdb to 4.008 ns since it was updated only for the range that was previously selected for calibration.
>>>>>>> Let me know if you want me to do it.
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> Raffaella
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Il giorno 14 ago 2019, alle ore 15:43, Latifa Elouadrhiri <latifa at jlab.org> ha scritto:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The runs 5424 and 6715 located uner /work/clas12/rg-a/trains/calibration/v17/ are ready for calibrations.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The goal is to start the calibrations of this run for FTOF and DC as soon as possible once these two systems are completed we will recook for the calibrations of remaining systems.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> We should work as efficiently as possible the goal is to start pass0/and reprocessing of these two run on Friday 8/23. Priority is given to the run 5424, RGA Fall out-bending as we will need to process sufficient statistics for the DNP.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Latifa
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Rga_calib mailing list
>>>>>>>> Rga_calib at jlab.org
>>>>>>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/rga_calib
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> -- 
> ================================================
> Prof. Annalisa D'Angelo
> Dip. Fisica, Universita' di Roma "Tor Vergata"
> INFN Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome Italy
> email:annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it
> Jefferson Laboratory, Newport News, VA USA
> Email: annalisa at jlab.org
> Tel: + 39 06 72594562
> 
> 
>