[Rga_calib] [EXTERNAL] Re: RGA-Calibration-Spring2018

[Latifa Elouadrhiri]

Dear Silvia 

Received. Thank you.

Latifa



> On Jun 25, 2021, at 9:49 AM, silvia at jlab.org wrote:
> 
> Dear Latifa,
> sorry for not attending the meeting the other day. Here is where we stand
> for CND:
> 
> 3134-3214: timing completely off but I guess these runs are not going to
> be used (bad RF as well for most of them)? If they are needed, I'll need
> to calibrate one run in this range.
> 
> 3215-3222: if these runs are used, I'll need one run from this range.
> 
> 3306-3547: I need one run in this range (I think I asked it at the
> previous iteration too but the file was not cooked)
> 
> The rest looks pretty acceptable, aside from these "individual" (or groups
> of 2, 3 runs) runs showing jumps in the timing calibration (but are these
> good and required production runs?): 3549, 3782, 3863, 4142. If these are
> necessary runs, I'll calibrate them all as well.
> 
> Best regards,
> Silvia
> 
> 
>> Dear Raffaella
>> 
>> Thank you for the input
>> 
>> Best regards
>> 
>> Latifa
>> 
>> On Jun 24, 2021, at 11:56 AM, Raffaella De Vita
>> <raffaella.devita at ge.infn.it> wrote:
>> 
>>  Dear Latifa,
>> I will not be able to attend the meeting but here are few comments on the
>> FT and RF calibration status:
>> - FTCAL: both energy and time calibrations look good; the few outlier runs
>> are either empty target or low statistics.
>> - FTHODO: same as above with the exception of the very first run range
>> (3134-3222) were time is off; is this range considered to have good runs?
>> - RF: there is need for an adjustment of the constants that can be done
>> with the files of this pass0. The exception is the very first run range
>> 3134-3222 that would require some adjustment to the FTOF calibrations
>> first.
>> Best regards,
>> Raffaella
>> 
>> On 23 Jun 2021, at 16:41, Latifa Elouadrhiri
>> <latifa at jlab.org<mailto:latifa at jlab.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear All,
>> 
>> Please find in the link below the latest QA timeline of RGA-Calibrations.
>> Please review your subsystem and define if new calibrations are needed.
>> https://clas12mon.jlab.org/timelines/?rg=rga
>> 
>> We will have a dedicated meeting tomorrow at 12:00 PM to go over the
>> status and next steps. If you are unable to attend please send me your
>> feedback before the meeting.
>> 
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Latifa
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rga_calib mailing list
>> Rga_calib at jlab.org<mailto:Rga_calib at jlab.org>
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/rga_calib
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rga_calib mailing list
>> Rga_calib at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/rga_calib
>> 
> 
>