[Rga_calib] [EXTERNAL] Re: RGA - Spring2018 Pass0 timeline

[Raffaella De Vita]

Dear Latifa,
I checked the RF timelines and the initial section, i.e. run range 3134-3293, is the one for which no RF calibrations were uploaded yet since there is need for an FTOF calibration of at least one run first. In fact the sector-to-sector variations and the in-sector resolution are too large to proceed with RF calibration.
The other outliers seems to be failed fits that should be looked at. There are also two runs with no events that maybe should be dropped?
Best regards,
	Raffaella 

> On 27 Mar 2021, at 14:40, Latifa Elouadrhiri <latifa at jlab.org> wrote:
> 
>  Dear All,
> 
> Please find in the link below the timeline from the latest pass0 of the RGA-Spring2018 based on the calibration of two reference runs and rf clabrations of this run period.
> 
> https://clas12mon.jlab.org/rga/pass0/v2.2.35/tlsummary/ <https://clas12mon.jlab.org/rga/pass0/v2.2.35/tlsummary/>
> 
> Next steps:
> 
> Raffaella to review the RF calibrations (they look good small section at the beginning to be look at)
> Dan to determine the list of runs needed for FTOF calibrations
> Tay to determine the list of runs needed for DC calibrations
> Everyone need to look at their systems
> Then we proceed with the calibrations according to the sequence of CLAS12 subsytems calibrations.
> 
> Please let me know if you have any questions.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Latifa
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rga_calib mailing list
> Rga_calib at jlab.org <mailto:Rga_calib at jlab.org>
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/rga_calib <https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/rga_calib>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/rga_calib/attachments/20210329/89b42d4a/attachment.html>