[Rgc] [Fwd: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: RGC Summer 2022 Pass1 review]

[silvia at jlab.org]

Dear RGC,
FYI, here is the reply that I just sent to the pass1 committee to address
their recommandation.
Best regards,
Silvia

---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: RGC Summer 2022 Pass1 review
From:    silvia at jlab.org
Date:    Thu, February 1, 2024 7:48 am
To:      "Marco Battaglieri" <battaglieri at ge.infn.it>
Cc:      "Will Phelps" <wphelps at jlab.org>
         "Cole Smith" <lcsmith at jlab.org>
         "Larry Weinstein" <weinstei at jlab.org>
         "Nathan Baltzell" <baltzell at jlab.org>
         "mirazita" <mirazita at lnf.infn.it>
         "Patrick Achenbach" <patricka at jlab.org>
         "Daniel Carman" <carman at jlab.org>
         "Raffaella De Vita" <devita at ge.infn.it>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Marco and dear review committee,
please find in attachment our reply to your recommendations.
You'll find it also linked to the review wiki page:
https://clasweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/RGC_Summer2022_pass1_review
A list of problematic runs is provided, and our online runlists have been
updated accordingly. The RGC group will be informed of the need to refer
to the runlists before attempting data analysis.
We also provide a detailed study of the "jumps" in the FC-normalized
yields from the QA timelines, with a zoom over the run range that was
plagued by bleedthrough.
We believe that a proper analysis of the impact of the bleedthrough on our
data cannot really be done with the small statistics of pass0, but will
require the cooking of the full runs. We may end up not using the data
affected by bleedthrough, in the end, but we prefer to have the chance to
analyze them to fully understand the issue.
We will also carry out, like was done for RGB, a post-processing QA
analysis, which will lead to updated golden runs lists and, if necessary,
"golden event ranges" lists.
Thank you very much for your very useful comments!
Best regards,
Silvia on behalf of RGC


> Dear Will,
> here in attachment the report of RG-C Summer-2022 pass-1 data cooking
> review.
> Bottom line is that the review committee encourages the CCC to give the
> green light for RG-C pass-1 data cooking
> after consideration of  some recommendations.
> Do not hesitate to contact me in case anything is unclear or you need
> more details/explanations.
> I'd like to thank Silvia (as well as the whole RG-C crew) for their
> thorough presentation of the job done.
> Cheers
> Marco
>
>
> Marco Battaglieri wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> I just want to remind you that tomorrow we'll have the (zoom) meeting
>> for RGC Summer 2022 Pass1 data cooking.
>> The wiki page is here:
>> https://clasweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/RGC_Summer2022_pass1_review
>> See you tomorrow
>> Cheers
>> Marco
>>
>> Marco Battaglieri wrote:
>>> Dear all
>>> the Pass1 RGC Summer data set on *Friday Jan 26 from 10:30AM to
>>> 12:30PM ET*.
>>> The charge is in attachment.
>>> The committee is expecting RGC to respond to the charge in a thorough
>>> way preparing all the supporting documentation,a wiki page and
>>> presentations posted at least one day in advance.
>>> The review is expected to last 2h with 90-100mn of presentations from
>>> the RG and 30-20mn closed-session (committee only) to discuss the
>>> outcome  of the review and prepare the report for a quick turnaround.
>>> For remote attendance you can use the following zoom  link:
>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__jlab-2Dorg.zoomgov.com_j_1608820203-3Fpwd-3DYzVJd0M3Qmlqb2xXa1I0a3pvV0t1UT09&d=DwIDaQ&c=CJqEzB1piLOyyvZjb8YUQw&r=LNUyx07OPlPP7unJr9bKdw&m=cB_BAGOILw7yd_H7kuYaDJGDRJO0DC88vElsofSYLlJ5lAq7haVoQZh16vgR7Eh_&s=QAmqW5Csty8C32Pgx4Ik4wa60BxBhtNf3cnDxQuw_IA&e=
>>> Talk to you then!
>>> Cheers
>>> Marco
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: replies_pass1_review_summer2022.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 303745 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/rgc/attachments/20240201/b4a17d98/attachment-0001.pdf>