[Rgc] [Rgc_analysis] check trains definitions

[Silvia Niccolai]

Hi Sebastian,
They could use the gmn train for the lower W, maybe. If we remove the W cut from sidisdvcs I fear that it would get way too big (it is already quite massive) and tough to handle in analysis. 
Best regards,
Silvia

Sent from my iPhone

> On 10 Jan 2024, at 18:52, Sebastian Kuhn <kuhn at jlab.org> wrote:
> 
> These trains look largely fine to me. I’m not sure, though, whether we don’t need another skim that specifically includes the resonance region? (We could simply drop the W cut on SIDISDVCS). Maybe nobody is interested in that for now, but I know that the UConn group has looked into RGA data to extract resonance parameters at high Q2, and polarization data would certainly help sharpen that analysis. (It also would help US with radiative models…)
> 
> Cheers - Sebastian
> 
>> On Jan 9, 2024, at 9:29 AM, Silvia Niccolai via Rgc_analysis <rgc_analysis at jlab.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear all,
>> following the discussion in today's meeting, and in preparation for the
>> pass2 review, please review the definitions of the trains we've been using
>> so far, and send me your comments as soon as possible. If I hear nothing
>> by tomorrow (Wednesday), we'll launch the cooking of the 5 runs (4 NH3 and
>> 1 C) to be used to prepare the pass1 review using these trains.
>> 
>> Here they are:
>> 
>>     "  custom-names:",
>>     "    1: jpsi ",
>>     "    2: gmn",
>>     "    3: edeutcut",
>>     "    4: sidisdvcs",
>>     "    5: two    ",
>>     "  io-services:",
>>     "    writer:",
>>     "      compression: 2",
>>     "  services:",
>>     "#################################################### JPSI/TCS",
>>     "    JPSITCS:",
>>     "      id: 1",
>>     "#################################################### nDVCS",
>>     "    gmn1:",
>>     "      id: 2",
>>     "      forward: 11:Xn",
>>     "      beamEnergy: 10.5473",
>>     "      targetPDG: 2112",
>>     "      electron: Q2>0.95 && W<2 && vz>-25 && vz<20",
>>     "    gmn2:",
>>     "      id: 2",
>>     "      forward: 11:2212:Xn",
>>     "      beamEnergy: 10.5473",
>>     "      targetPDG: 2212",
>>     "      electron: Q2>0.95 && W<2 && vz>-25 && vz<20",
>>     "#################################################### eDeut",
>>     "    eDeutQ1:",
>>     "      id: 3",
>>     "      forward: 11:45:X+:X-:Xn",
>>     "      beamEnergy: 10.5473",
>>     "      targetPDG: 45",
>>     "      electron: Q2>0.95 && W>1.95 && p>1 && vz>-25 && vz<20 ",
>>     "    eDeutQ2:",
>>     "      id: 3",
>>     "      forward: 11:X+:X-:Xn",
>>     "      central: 45:X+:X-:Xn",
>>     "      beamEnergy: 10.5473",
>>     "      targetPDG: 45",
>>     "      electron: Q2>0.95 && W>1.95 && p>1 && vz>-25 && vz<20     ",
>>     "#################################################### sidisdvcs",
>>     "    sidisdvcs:",
>>     "      id: 4",
>>     "      forward: 11:X+:X-:Xn",
>>     "      beamEnergy: 10.5473",
>>     "      targetPDG: 2112 ",
>>     "      electron: Q2>0.95 && W>1.95 && p>1 && vz>-25 && vz<20",
>>     "#################################################### Two",
>>     "    TWO1:",
>>     "      id: 5",
>>     "      filter: 321:321:X+:X-:Xn",
>>     "    TWO2:",
>>     "      id: 5",
>>     "      filter: 2212:2212:X+:X-:Xn      ",
>>     "",
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Silvia
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rgc_analysis mailing list
>> Rgc_analysis at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/rgc_analysis
>