[Rgc_analysis] RGC Spin 2023 Talk

[Carlos Ayerbe Gayoso]

Hi Greg,

my two cents:

  *   I see that it is a summary talk of RGC. So, so many things to talk. So, I am trying to reduce the load.
  *   Slides 2 and 3 could be just one and very brief. There will be MANY JLab talks in SPIN and a detailed description is not necessary. Be brief here.
  *   Slide 4, notice that you are repeating the capabilities of the accelerator (polarization, energy).  In the slide, you combine facts or RGC with what should be CLAS description (title of the slide). If I am not wrong (quite possible), could be better to say that CLAS can handle a luminosity of 10^35 (??) which will set, depending on the target, the max current.
  *   Slide 5, not sure that I understand the cartoon on the side. Move it lower to cover a bit of the white space.
  *   Slide 7 should be what is different from Slide 4 for RGC. Perhaps a brief explanation why the two configurations? Maybe address it in particular experiments?
  *   Slide 8 and 9, since Pushpa will present the target with more detail, just make one slide and point the most relevant factors of it.
     *   I guess 1K trolley you mean, 1K refrigerator trolley.
     *   Target embedded within a 5T solenoid magnet
     *   not sure if it is important to mention the cryogenics details, but maybe mention the temperature achieved.
     *   could be nice to mention the range of polarization achieved, measured with the NMR in place. You can mention that is a matter of discussion (kinda)--> Slide 11
  *   Slide 10, not sure what do you want to show here. You can mention in a previous slide that the experiment were monitored with several systems, as a fast replay of the data (the histograms shown here), EPICS and labView (the NMR?)
  *   Slide 11, ummmhhh... I believe, that the title has a more broad meaning of what you are showing.
     *   my suggestion: G Matousek, Duke U, N. Pilleux, IJCLab, Université Paris Saclay
     *   maybe more contrasted colors of Noemie's plots?
  *   Slide 12 again, I believe the title has a broader meaning wrt what you are showing, a VERY specific effort in the calibration. Give it a thought about it
     *   D. Holmberg, WM
  *   Slide 13, this shows something that MAYBE should be mentioned before, the different targets used in the experiment, the production ones, the optics and the calibration ones. I would rephrase a bit the wording in the box, like you will describe the NH3 analysis. I guess you will need to explain (just speaking it), what do you mean with the timeline.
  *   Slide 14, 15 H. Avakian, JLab, make the names in black bold (also in the previous slides)
  *   Slide 16, 17 T. Hayward, UConn
  *   Slides 18, 19 N. Pilleux, IJCLab, Université Paris Saclay <-- ask Noemie or Silvia for a shorter name
  *   Slide 20, I noticed that you used a different font for e-, d, but here p and n are just italics. Try to keep the same style
     *   target and beam (do not use &)
     *   I would put "Large Acceptance..." which is given by the capabilities of CLAS, as first item.
  *   I guess that was a decision taken in the Analysis meeting, but I miss something more deep from your work in the talk. Something that can bring you into the light among the community.

Greg, maybe my list is very long, some of the points are just suggestions that won't change the content, some of them are items that people with deeper knowledge than me would tell if they are correct or not. Just read the list and think about it.

Good luck!!

Cheers
-Carlos

-------------------------------------------------
If you receive this e-mail after hours, during a weekend, or on a holiday,
please enjoy your time off and respond during your working hours.
________________________________
From: Gregory Matousek via Rgc_analysis <rgc_analysis at jlab.org>
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2023 11:41 AM
To: rgc_analysis at jlab.org <rgc_analysis at jlab.org>
Subject: [Rgc_analysis] [EXTERNAL] RGC Spin 2023 Talk

Hi all,

Here are the updated slides for the RGC talk I'm giving on Monday September 25th at SPIN. Please feel free to send over any feedback!


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/rgc_analysis/attachments/20230922/eb071456/attachment.html>