[Sane-analysis] updated kinematic plot

[Mark Jones]

Whit,

Another difference is the plots is that I put a cut at 1 GeV. So effectively
this raises my means for energy for the low Q2 bins and in effect forces the prot
and rcs to be the same for these bins , since they both cant have
energy below 1 in the bin. 

If it is not a lot of work can you send Jixie and me a file with the point on the plot 
so we can compare directly and use a 1 GeV energy cut off?

          Cheers,
                 Mark

----- Original Message -----
From: "Whitney R. Armstrong" <whit at temple.edu>
To: "Mark Jones" <jones at jlab.org>
Cc: "sane-analysis" <sane-analysis at jlab.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 2:37:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Sane-analysis] updated kinematic plot



Here is an update for my kinematic plots: 



Monte Carlo Parallel 5.9 GeV: 
http://quarks.temple.edu/~whit/SANE/analysis_main/results/asymmetries/asym_kine_para59_vsx_4703.png 


Monte Carlo Perpendicular 5.9 GeV: 

http://quarks.temple.edu/~whit/SANE/analysis_main/results/asymmetries/asym_kine_perp59_vsx_4706.png 







On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Mark Jones < jones at jlab.org > wrote: 


I updated my kinematic plot with the correct cut on vertical 
position to identify RCS versus Protvino part. It didn't make much 
difference. The new file has been uploaded. I also see that Jixie 
has placed his files on the wiki. 


Mark 
_______________________________________________ 
Sane-analysis mailing list 
Sane-analysis at jlab.org 
https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-analysis 



-- 
Whitney Armstrong