[Sane-analysis] Updates on Tracker Studies

[Oscar Rondon-Aramayo]

Hi Luwani,

Thank you for the report. It seems to show that at the lower energies the 
tracker is making extra two charged cluster events vs no tracker.

But there are a couple of things that are a bit unclear to me. One is why 
for the case of data with the tracker the number of events = 57915 with e- 
or e+ for E'>1.1  GeV  is greater than the number = 44415 for  E>1. GeV 
(third and fourth rows of table 2, p. 4). It would seem there should be 
fewer events (of any kind) with increasing E. Could this be a typo?

Another is why the sum of the cluster energies e_r(1) + e_r(2) are getting 
binned in some discrete groups, rather than in a more or less continuous 
distribution.

Finally, it would be good to see what are the numbers for E>1.3 GeV, which 
should be more similar for tracker vs no tracker than for the lower energy 
cuts. On p. 2 you say "nothing above 1.1 GeV". Do you mean there are no 
events with E'> 1.1 GeV? It would also be nice to see a plot of the 
differences tracker vs no tracker as a function of energy cut to see the 
trend.

Cheers,

Oscar

  
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 23:54:13 -0500
  "Luwani Z. Ndukum" <lzn1 at msstate.edu> wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
> 
> Here's what I intended to present during the analysis meeting but I
> couldn't upload it to the SANE wiki because JLab network was down.
> https://userweb.jlab.org/~lzwano/tracker_studies.pdf
> 
> Kind regards
> Luwani