<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<br>
<u><b>James:</b></u> Printed out asymmetries tables in format that is
esaier to read, sorted by bins and cuts.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://hallcweb.jlab.org/experiments/sane/wiki/index.php/Binned_Asymmetries#Matrix_of_Asymmetries_by_Run_number_and_Cut:_1.2F26.2F2011">https://hallcweb.jlab.org/experiments/sane/wiki/index.php/Binned_Asymmetries#Matrix_of_Asymmetries_by_Run_number_and_Cut:_1.2F26.2F2011</a><br>
Will be giving a seminar on SANE at University of New Hampshire in the
next few weeks. This will be similar to the Hall C meeting talk he
gave, getting more in depth with the physics and
instrumentation&polarized target.<br>
<br>
<br>
<u><b>Luwani:</b></u> Looked at pi0 asymmetry as a function of
(cluster)energy for one run (73001; 4.7GeV parallel). The asymmetry is
essentially 0. Will include more runs/statistics.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://hallcweb.jlab.org/experiments/sane/wiki/index.php/Electron_and_pi0_energy_plots#Asymmetry">https://hallcweb.jlab.org/experiments/sane/wiki/index.php/Electron_and_pi0_energy_plots#Asymmetry</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<u><b>Hoyoung(Jan 27th):</b></u> Looked at packing fractions with
corrected (HMS single-arm)MC and slow raster definitions (for slow
raster radius < 1cm). The correction for the MC is for the elastic
peak where it was previously being smeared out due to some bug. Was
seeing a significant increase in radiative tail for NH3 run 72957. For
carbon run 72954 not much had changed though.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.jlab.org/~hykang/pf/20110125/">http://www.jlab.org/~hykang/pf/20110125/</a><br>
Working on comparing slow raster for data and MC. <br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.jlab.org/~hykang/pf/20110125/sr0.7/">http://www.jlab.org/~hykang/pf/20110125/sr0.7/</a><br>
For both of these, though, found fixed code hadn't been checked as
thought from CVS. Will get it fixed and look again<br>
Looking some more at charge asymmetry. Mark mentioned that a cut on
beam current might be necessary. This is because for the scalers, when
there were periods of no beam (for few minutes) during a run there
would be a default value of input of 30nA. Suggested a cut of I_beam
> 60-65nA.<br>
<br>
<br>
As always, please let me know if I missed anything or if I made any
mistake(s)<br>
<br>
Next meeting will be February 2nd 3:30pm JLab time.<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>