<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<br>
Think I mis-spoke. The errors estimated to decrease will be those for
g_2, not just 4.7GeV.<br>
<br>
<br>
Narbe Kalantarians wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4E285EAF.3050801@jlab.org" type="cite"><br>
<u><b>Oscar:</b></u> Comparing ssf's g_1,2 data/FOM. The statistics
are
known to be lower than what was proposed due to known reasons (target
and beam issues, Cerenkov and BigCal efficiencies). This has a cut of
E' > 1.3 GeV <br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://twist.phys.virginia.edu/%7Eor/sane/FOM_vs_data.pdf">http://twist.phys.virginia.edu/~or/sane/FOM_vs_data.pdf</a><br>
Estimates that error bars for the 4.7GeV data may decrease by ~>
30%, after some of the data gets recovered (via better calibrations).
Will also try looking with E' > 0.8 GeV.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>