<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<br>
<u><b>Narbe:</b></u> Updated kinematics binning tables using Jonathan's
latest E' resolution result.<br>
<br>
Looking at some dilution factors with the radiative corrections
applied. Seem reasonable. <br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://hallcweb.jlab.org/experiments/sane/wiki/index.php/Kinematics#08.2F03.2F2011">https://hallcweb.jlab.org/experiments/sane/wiki/index.php/Kinematics#08.2F03.2F2011</a><br>
Will check some final details before redoing dilution factors overall
and will also produce dilution factors in x_Bj bins.<br>
<br>
<u><b>James:</b></u> Comparing physics asymmetries using raw
asymmetries from Octavian(older) and the Lacie RAID-disk (more recent,
done on the batch farm). The perpendicular asymmetries seem fairly
consistent, but the parallel asymmetries are noticeable different. <br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://hallcweb.jlab.org/experiments/sane/wiki/index.php/Binned_Asymmetries#Comparing_New_Lacie_Replay:_8.2F2.2F2011">https://hallcweb.jlab.org/experiments/sane/wiki/index.php/Binned_Asymmetries#Comparing_New_Lacie_Replay:_8.2F2.2F2011</a><br>
Will check to see if using same files (and no Carbon runs) and also if
using same prescriptions<br>
<br>
Applying elastic radiative tail correction to asymmetries. Seem to be
working as they should. <br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://hallcweb.jlab.org/experiments/sane/wiki/index.php/Radiative_Corrections#Applying_Rad_Tail:_8.2F3.2F2011">https://hallcweb.jlab.org/experiments/sane/wiki/index.php/Radiative_Corrections#Applying_Rad_Tail:_8.2F3.2F2011</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<u><b>Hovhannes:</b></u> Looked at parallel physics asymmetries using
raw asymmetries from Lacie RAID-disk. Gets results more similar to
James' results with the raw asymmetries from Octavian. <br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://hallcweb.jlab.org/experiments/sane/wiki/index.php/A180">https://hallcweb.jlab.org/experiments/sane/wiki/index.php/A180</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<u><b>Oscar:</b></u> Also comparing physics asymmetries between those
using the raw asymmetries from Octavian and the Lacie RAID-disk.
Plotted in units of standard deviation. The physics asymmetries differ
by a considerable amount. <br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://hallcweb.jlab.org/experiments/sane/rondon/analysis/asym/final-raw_apara_lacie-octavian.pdf">https://hallcweb.jlab.org/experiments/sane/rondon/analysis/asym/final-raw_apara_lacie-octavian.pdf</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<u><b>Anusha:</b></u> Update on slow-raster offsets. Originally using
slow raster offsets determined using 4.73 GeV data. But sees that it
doesn't work quite as well for the 5.89 GeV data. <br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://hallcweb.jlab.org/experiments/sane/wiki/index.php/C_runs_with_Parallel_Field_ON#Check_with_5_pass_C_run">https://hallcweb.jlab.org/experiments/sane/wiki/index.php/C_runs_with_Parallel_Field_ON#Check_with_5_pass_C_run</a><br>
Will try a procedure of <br>
1) Correct ytar with the slow-raster x and y offsets.<br>
2) Correct for any correlation(s) between xptar and mass of final
states W via azimuthal correction.<br>
3) Fix any remaining offset in data/MC for xptar with slow-raster y
offset.<br>
4) As a check, see that there isn't any correlation between xptar and
yptar.<br>
<br>
<br>
As always, please let me know if I missed anything or if I made any
mistake(s).<br>
<br>
Next meeting will be August 10 at 3:30pm JLab time.<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>