<div dir="ltr"><div>Here is an update for my kinematic plots:<br></div><div><br></div><div>Monte Carlo Parallel 5.9 GeV:</div><div><a href="http://quarks.temple.edu/~whit/SANE/analysis_main/results/asymmetries/asym_kine_para59_vsx_4703.png">http://quarks.temple.edu/~whit/SANE/analysis_main/results/asymmetries/asym_kine_para59_vsx_4703.png</a></div>
<div><br></div><div>Monte Carlo Perpendicular 5.9 GeV:<br></div><div><a href="http://quarks.temple.edu/~whit/SANE/analysis_main/results/asymmetries/asym_kine_perp59_vsx_4706.png">http://quarks.temple.edu/~whit/SANE/analysis_main/results/asymmetries/asym_kine_perp59_vsx_4706.png</a></div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Mark Jones <<a href="mailto:jones@jlab.org">jones@jlab.org</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote">I updated my kinematic plot with the correct cut on vertical<br>
position to identify RCS versus Protvino part. It didn't make much<br>
difference. The new file has been uploaded. I also see that Jixie<br>
has placed his files on the wiki.<br>
<br>
<br>
Mark<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Sane-analysis mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Sane-analysis@jlab.org">Sane-analysis@jlab.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-analysis">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-analysis</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Whitney Armstrong<br>
</div>