[Sbs_gems] [EXTERNAL] Upper limits in terms of beam current for the GEM study planned for tomorrow

[Anuruddha Rathnayake]

Hi Kondo,

I just double checked. The titles of the plots in the above log entry are
correct.

SBS-8 -> LH2
SBS-11 -> LD2

Best,
Anu

On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 12:34 PM Gnanvo, Kondo (kg6cq) <kg6cq at virginia.edu>
wrote:

> Hi Anu,
>
> The title for all your plots shows LH2 but even when some studies where
> done with LD2. Could you confirm which target these studies where performed
> at for SBS-8 and SBS-14?
>
> Thanks
>
> Kondo
>
>
>
> *From:* Sbs_gems <sbs_gems-bounces at jlab.org> *On Behalf Of *Anuruddha
> Rathnayake
> *Sent:* Sunday, February 6, 2022 9:52 AM
> *To:* sbs_gems at jlab.org
> *Cc:* Arun Tadepalli <arunts at jlab.org>
> *Subject:* [Sbs_gems] [EXTERNAL] Upper limits in terms of beam current
> for the GEM study planned for tomorrow
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> There is a discussion going on between our current RC (Arun) and some of
> us here in Jlab about what would be the beam current limits that we should
> adhere to, if it is possible to come into such a limit looking at the
> observations we have made so far.
>
> I'm attaching the GEM linearity studies we have done so far, if that helps
> to make a decision. https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3932489
>
> I believe if you use linearity studies done at SBS-11, that would be the
> best as our current spectrometer angles at SBS-9 are similar to what we had
> at SBS-9 (Please correct me if I am wrong, I know this more of as a word of
> mouth rather than referring to any official documentation).
>
> Best,
> Anu
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/sbs_gems/attachments/20220206/a9124f65/attachment-0001.html>