<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Aptos;
panose-1:2 11 0 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;
mso-ligatures:none;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Sean, I agree with the notational change. I always found the “Seamus notation” confusing and less transparent. This is much more clear. Also, you can introduce a shorthand notation:
<br>
<br>
f_n = 1 – Sum_x f_x as the fraction of all events that are quasi-elastic (e,e’n). This notation should also make it easier to construct an unbinned maximum-likelihood estimator for “A_phys” as well, should we decide to pursue that option.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Cheers,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Andrew<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">From:
</span></b><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">Sbs_software <sbs_software-bounces@jlab.org> on behalf of Sean Jeffas via Sbs_software <sbs_software@jlab.org><br>
<b>Reply-To: </b>Sean Jeffas <sj9ry@virginia.edu><br>
<b>Date: </b>Friday, March 1, 2024 at 12:02 PM<br>
<b>To: </b>"armd@jlab.org" <armd@jlab.org><br>
<b>Cc: </b>"sbs_software@jlab.org" <sbs_software@jlab.org><br>
<b>Subject: </b>[Sbs_software] [EXTERNAL] Re: [Sbs] GEn-II Analysis meeting at 10:00 AM EST<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi David,<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">This is great, thank you! I repeated the calculation, with the result highlighted at the end. The only difference I find is the polarization factors come in differently, but I assume this is just a factor from the different experiments.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Going forward I would like to use this formalism, so if any GEN experts have any objections to it please let me know before I get too deep in.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Best,<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Sean<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 12:12<span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"> </span>PM David Armstrong <<a href="mailto:armd@jlab.org">armd@jlab.org</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi Sean, all,<br>
<br>
The more standard formalism is in Eq. (3) of<br>
<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__journals.aps.org_prl_abstract_10.1103_PhysRevLett.128.132501&d=DwMFaQ&c=CJqEzB1piLOyyvZjb8YUQw&r=QlYVvSkd1eI3G8amPtrE_if6U-4zjeas0cAWa4BvYGo&m=_ntnW4g7gyZJq4xA-avfypqRtzO8e-auZEp21d3weJ-vPwIXW_Lhdg79Jf6FBnNE&s=Z3VEoGrSvQb0ST1OP3q2iBB3c-qHgxGlpKizCn9xa8s&e=" target="_blank">
https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.132501</a><br>
(preprint: <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__arxiv.org_abs_2112.15412&d=DwMFaQ&c=CJqEzB1piLOyyvZjb8YUQw&r=QlYVvSkd1eI3G8amPtrE_if6U-4zjeas0cAWa4BvYGo&m=_ntnW4g7gyZJq4xA-avfypqRtzO8e-auZEp21d3weJ-vPwIXW_Lhdg79Jf6FBnNE&s=xBf35gGzCxpGc4yKh8NRKnBGySsvVVNdZe3_9DB_Dqc&e=" target="_blank">
https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.15412</a>)<br>
<br>
with excerpt attached (previous reply was too large to be sent to SBS mailing list).<br>
<br>
Hope this makes sense; I can chat with you if something is unclear.<br>
cheers,<br>
David<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On 2/29/24 12:07 PM, David Armstrong wrote:<br>
> <br>
> Hi Sean,<br>
> <br>
> The more standard formalism is in Eq. (3) of the attached paper, for<br>
> example.<br>
> <br>
> cheers,<br>
> David<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> On 2/29/24 11:39 AM, Sean Jeffas via Sbs_software wrote:<br>
>> Hi All,<br>
>><br>
>> There was some discussion today about the formalism in which the <br>
>> asymmetry corrections are applied. See page 307 in Freddy's thesis for <br>
>> how it was done for GEN-I, <br>
>> <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__inspirehep.net_files_03fe72dd8545c3b7f381a8f2fe4ed55d&d=DwMFaQ&c=CJqEzB1piLOyyvZjb8YUQw&r=QlYVvSkd1eI3G8amPtrE_if6U-4zjeas0cAWa4BvYGo&m=_ntnW4g7gyZJq4xA-avfypqRtzO8e-auZEp21d3weJ-vPwIXW_Lhdg79Jf6FBnNE&s=UVQvJMWyxco3-zKstD1FwWXIgtBIYjRKQBFT_vJTLf0&e=" target="_blank">
https://inspirehep.net/files/03fe72dd8545c3b7f381a8f2fe4ed55d</a> <br>
>> <<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__inspirehep.net_files_03fe72dd8545c3b7f381a8f2fe4ed55d&d=DwMFaQ&c=CJqEzB1piLOyyvZjb8YUQw&r=QlYVvSkd1eI3G8amPtrE_if6U-4zjeas0cAWa4BvYGo&m=LZDdeeaHEbZ873ONztqhohDVNNC_N1yPLDAqOnzvvgGXsInpVNaltiPNbpEOhmbi&s=lbH8oUFRX7V2Z0EAUH-42tztmis3W-C7vyUY6m1tbFI&e=" target="_blank">https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__inspirehep.net_files_03fe72dd8545c3b7f381a8f2fe4ed55d&d=DwMFaQ&c=CJqEzB1piLOyyvZjb8YUQw&r=QlYVvSkd1eI3G8amPtrE_if6U-4zjeas0cAWa4BvYGo&m=LZDdeeaHEbZ873ONztqhohDVNNC_N1yPLDAqOnzvvgGXsInpVNaltiPNbpEOhmbi&s=lbH8oUFRX7V2Z0EAUH-42tztmis3W-C7vyUY6m1tbFI&e=</a>><br>
>><br>
>> I was following this formalism but it was brought up that there is a <br>
>> more "standard" way. Could someone elaborate on this?<br>
>><br>
>> Best,<br>
>> Sean<br>
>><br>
>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 8:26<span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"> </span>PM Arun Tadepalli via Sbs <<a href="mailto:sbs@jlab.org" target="_blank">sbs@jlab.org</a>
<br>
>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:sbs@jlab.org" target="_blank">sbs@jlab.org</a>>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Hello GEn-II Collaborators,<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Let’s make the best use of the leap year day and have our GEn-II<br>
>> analysis meeting on Thursday, 29th of February, at 10:00 am EST.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Agenda:<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> 1. Moller Polarimetry Results -> Faraz Chahili<br>
>><br>
>> 2. Asymmetry Corrections -> Sean Jeffas<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__jlab-2Dorg.zoomgov.com_s_16077967861&d=DwMFaQ&c=CJqEzB1piLOyyvZjb8YUQw&r=QlYVvSkd1eI3G8amPtrE_if6U-4zjeas0cAWa4BvYGo&m=_ntnW4g7gyZJq4xA-avfypqRtzO8e-auZEp21d3weJ-vPwIXW_Lhdg79Jf6FBnNE&s=RNVAunRcAKISaMrmk3N_-vLCpFvdoDFy6bbnkzFaLzU&e=" target="_blank">
https://jlab-org.zoomgov.com/s/16077967861</a><br>
>> <br>
>> <<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__jlab-2Dorg.zoomgov.com_s_16077967861&d=DwMFaQ&c=CJqEzB1piLOyyvZjb8YUQw&r=QlYVvSkd1eI3G8amPtrE_if6U-4zjeas0cAWa4BvYGo&m=LZDdeeaHEbZ873ONztqhohDVNNC_N1yPLDAqOnzvvgGXsInpVNaltiPNbpEOhmbi&s=laiyuAn7-ev3T-u5uIWRcJfU_3BR7Umdd4klY-ATsvQ&e=" target="_blank">https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__jlab-2Dorg.zoomgov.com_s_16077967861&d=DwMFaQ&c=CJqEzB1piLOyyvZjb8YUQw&r=QlYVvSkd1eI3G8amPtrE_if6U-4zjeas0cAWa4BvYGo&m=LZDdeeaHEbZ873ONztqhohDVNNC_N1yPLDAqOnzvvgGXsInpVNaltiPNbpEOhmbi&s=laiyuAn7-ev3T-u5uIWRcJfU_3BR7Umdd4klY-ATsvQ&e=</a>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> The wiki page for this meeting can be found here:<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> <br>
>> <a href="https://sbs.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/GEn_Analysis_Meeting_February_29_2024_10AM_EST" target="_blank">
https://sbs.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/GEn_Analysis_Meeting_February_29_2024_10AM_EST</a> <<a href="https://sbs.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/GEn_Analysis_Meeting_February_29_2024_10AM_EST" target="_blank">https://sbs.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/GEn_Analysis_Meeting_February_29_2024_10AM_EST</a>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Best regards,<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Arun<br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> Sbs mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:Sbs@jlab.org" target="_blank">Sbs@jlab.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Sbs@jlab.org" target="_blank">Sbs@jlab.org</a>><br>
>> <a href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/sbs" target="_blank">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/sbs</a><br>
>> <<a href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/sbs" target="_blank">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/sbs</a>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> Sbs_software mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:Sbs_software@jlab.org" target="_blank">Sbs_software@jlab.org</a><br>
>> <a href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/sbs_software" target="_blank">
https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/sbs_software</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>