<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div><div><div><div>Hi Mike,<br>thank you for the plots that gives a starting point.<br><br></div>Could you also add the plots of efficiency and distribution of rate in the detector ?<br><br></div>
There might be some way to optimize by increasing some threshold in places where there is a lot of light.<br><br></div>Also I think you mentioned that most of the time only 2 or 3 PMTs are hit.<br><br></div>But could you also look at the sum over 9 PMTs with higher PE thresholds, there might be some places where we could put a higher threshold on the sum.<br>
</div>Though it is possible the rate just goes crazy when you sum all 9 PMTs.<br><br></div>Hopefully with the increased baffle and beam pipe size that can be further reduced.<br><br></div>Alexandre<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Michael Paolone <<a href="mailto:mpaolone@jlab.org">mpaolone@jlab.org</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote">
Hi everyone,<br>
<br>
As promised, I have some new results for my latest Low energy background<br>
rate calculation on the LGC. You can find the numbers on the wiki at:<br>
<br>
<a href="https://hallaweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/SIDIS/PVDIS_Cherenkov">https://hallaweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/SIDIS/PVDIS_Cherenkov</a><br>
<br>
I'm also running more simulation now with the the first baffle inner<br>
radius = 5cm, and no beampipe/absorber.<br>
<br>
-Michael<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Solid_daq mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Solid_daq@jlab.org">Solid_daq@jlab.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/solid_daq">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/solid_daq</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>