[Solid_tracking] help with SoLID GEM simulation

[kagnanvo at jlab.org]

Hi Zhiwen,
I am currently at JLab so we could meet for a little bit of discussion.
There are some small technical differences so I think it is better to
to sit down and talk rather than by e-mail since I am here

Anytime this afternoon would be OK for me

Kondo

> Hi, Kondo and Nilanga
>
> Congratulations for the NIM paper!
>
> Evaristo update with SBS GEM geometry and material here
> https://hallaweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/Solid_Tracking#GEM_module.27s_geometry_and_material
> Is SoLID GEM exactly same?
>
> Thanks
>
> Zhiwen
>
> On 12/4/2015 11:16 AM, Zhiwen Zhao wrote:
>> Dear All
>>
>> To give input for Weizhi's tracking study, I am checking the SoLID GEM
>> simulation
>> and hopefully do it right this time
>>
>> Kondo
>> Could you help check if the geometry,material and response are correct?
>> here is some description
>> https://hallaweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/Solid_Tracking#GEM_module.27s_geometry_and_material
>>
>> here is implementation in GEMC perl script
>> https://jlabsvn.jlab.org/svnroot/solid/solid_gemc2/geometry/gem/solid_SIDIS_gem_geometry.pl
>>
>>
>> Seamus
>> Suppose SBS uses the exactly same hardware, would it possible to do
>> simulation and digitization
>> the same way for SoLID?
>> Could you let me know how it's implemented in SBS? Code would be nice.
>> By the way, I built SoLID GEM from Evaristo's old code. things must have
>> evolve now.
>>
>> Nilanga
>> Currently GEM in SoLID is simple donut like planes
>> It would be really nice if we can have the actual physical design
>> implemented.
>> It could have impact especially for SIDIS because the segmentation and
>> overlaps.
>> We don't have a person assigned with GEM simulation task.
>> I think we definitely need somebody to do careful study for the large
>> background rate and optimize the design.
>> Do you know a good person for it?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Zhiwen
>