[Tpe] good news bad news

[Mac Mestayer]

Hello again;

What are the two plots for each sector?
Is one for the triggering particle and the other
for the proton candidate?

 				- Mac

"mestayer at jlab.org", (757)-269-7252

On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Puneet Khetarpal wrote:

> Hi Mac,
>
> We are plotting the TOF Paddle hits as a function of RF offset for
> different torus polarities and different sectors as computed for
> electron and positron triggers. There should be no discrepancy between
> the electron and positron offsets for the two torus polarities.
>
> Puneet
>
> "No word is true until it is eaten" - 36 Lessons of Vivec, Sermon 27
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Mac Mestayer <mestayer at jlab.org> wrote:
>> Hello Puneet;
>>
>> Could you explain again exactly what is being plotted?
>>                        thanks, Mac
>>
>> "mestayer at jlab.org", (757)-269-7252
>>
>> On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Puneet Khetarpal wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> So, here are the results for the RF offset problem for the two torus
>>> polarities per Eugene's recommended p2p corrections:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/tpe/wiki/index.php/Timing_Checks#July_20.2C_2011
>>>
>>> The good news is that for the first 10 paddles for which we used
>>> inbenders to calibrate paddle to paddle, the rf offsets seem to have
>>> aligned themselves more-or-less appropriately for both run polarities.
>>> But the bad news is that for higher paddles where we used pi+'s for
>>> calibration we still see significant discrepancy.
>>>
>>> Recommendations?
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Puneet
>>>
>>> "No word is true until it is eaten" - 36 Lessons of Vivec, Sermon 27
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tpe mailing list
>>> Tpe at jlab.org
>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/tpe
>>>
>>
>