[Tpe] Fwd: Re: gpart vs npart
Larry Weinstein
lweinste at odu.edu
Tue May 24 13:46:04 EDT 2011
Dear Folks,
Here is the explanation of gpart vs npart from Stepan. I suggest we
follow his recommendation and use gpart >= 2 with at least two tracks
with dc_stat > 0.
- Larry
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: gpart vs npart
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 11:58:00 -0400
From: Stepan Stepanyan <stepanya at jlab.org>
To: Larry Weinstein <weinstei at jlab.org>
Dear Larry,
Since you are looking for two charged particles, it always
should be npart>=2. In fact for elastic npart=2. If find
more events with elastic kinematics, that means one of
tracks did not pass timing information. It can be either
time-based tracking (less likely) or TOF information was
way OFF - PID (if SC counters had too high occupancy this
is more likely). Since PID is not an issue for elastic events,
you may want to use gpart>=2 events, but make sure
you select those that have 2 time based tracks, dc_stat>0
for both tracks.
Regards, Stepan
On 5/24/11 11:51 AM, Larry Weinstein wrote:
> Dear Stepan,
>
> Thanks! Is there any reason to analyze gpart tracks or should we
> limit all our analysis to npart tracks? I ask because Puneet found
> about 10% more events passing our elastic cuts when he required gpart
> >= 2 rather than npart>= 2.
>
> - Larry
>
> PS: I am also appalled at the dearth of documentation on our offline
> software.
>
> Stepan Stepanyan wrote:
>> Dear Larry,
>>
>> There is no documentation on that. I sue to have a short writeup
>> link from old offline page but it disappeared for some reason.
>>
>> As for gpart/npart - gpart is number of "geometrically matched
>> particles", no timing information. Npart is number of particles
>> that were found after timing analysis (time based tracks and in
>> time neutral hits). EVNT bank has "gpart" entries, first "npart" of
>> which are particles that passed timing analysis.
>>
>> Regards, Stepan
>>
>> On 5/24/11 10:49 AM, Larry Weinstein wrote:
>>> Dear Stepan,
>>>
>>> Is there any documentation on the difference between gpart and
>>> npart? Are there any cuts on the data other than the number of HBT
>>> and TBT tracks per event?
>>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/tpe/attachments/20110524/da2613df/attachment.html
More information about the Tpe
mailing list