[Xgt2] Status report for X>2 analysis
zy8bb at virginia.edu
Thu Jan 19 12:33:33 EST 2012
My Jlab email has problems to receive email so I missed all your
discussion after I sent out the email. As I went through your replying,
I think we all agree that we will have four-week meeting at Friday 2pm.
To Patricia: Huan's data has some hardware issue so I believe he did
some special treatment. For our data, as you seen, at lease the focal
plane and target plane variables agree very well for C12, so I think the
code should not give problems to C12 data. I am preparing our model and
try to encode it into the SAMC code, so in the future, SAMC will be used
only as a events generator and for data reconstruction. We will see how
it work when I have our C12 cross sections.
To Nadia: I have the version of XEM from Patricia. I went through the
code and found out that it only goes up to xbj=2 and there are many
treatment for small xbj regions. Could you send me your most common
version so I can compare with?
@ _______/|______ 0
/| \_O. / / / /|\
|_| /______|_______/ O_/|_|
/ \ | | | | / \
Physics Department, University of Virginia
Office: Physics Building 014
Address: 382 McCormick RD, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4714
On 01/19/2012 10:49 AM, Donal Day wrote:
> Zhihong, I hope you have the right version of the code. XEM code was not used just for the EMC effect, but was also specifically iterated to work for teh 6GeV x>1 data analysis. IT also doesn't stop at x=2, since I fit it to the data and then used it to to do corrections for all the targets, not just deuterium.
> > It might be worth comparing the output of what you have with what I have for a few targets.
> > Nadia
More information about the xgt2