[APEX] apex paper second draft

[Juliette Mammei]

Hey guys,

Some of this is trivial, but the color of the figures may not be:

Why is "letter" italicized in the first paragraph?

Should it be "various anomalies in data related to dark matter searches"?

Are you going to pay for the color version in the journal?  If not then 
some of the figures and/or the description will not be understood when 
they are black and white... and it should be noted that there will be 
"color online".

Near the end, when you say that the nomenclature may not be standard, 
shouldn't you say what the terms correspond to in some standard?  Why 
are you not using standard nomenclature?  There may be good reason not 
to use the standard notation, but maybe you should give the "translation".

Sorry for such a late response.

Juliette

On 7/27/2011 7:50 PM, Bogdan Wojtsekhowski wrote:
> Dear APEX collaboration,
>
> Attached is the second PRL draft version for the APEX test run results.
> The results are almost final.
> Please take a look and send us any remaining comments by next week
> Monday August 1, 2011, at 5pm EST.
>
> We thank everyone who gave us valuable feedback and comments.
> We tried to incorporate as many of them as possible.  If there are things
> we did not change, but you feel strongly should be changed, please let us
> know.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Rouven, Philip, Natalia, and Bogdan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> APEX mailing list
> APEX at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/apex
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/apex/attachments/20110728/6360546c/attachment-0002.html>