[APEX] Fwd: APEX ERR: final report

[Natalia Toro]

Dear APEX collaborators,

I'm happy to share with you the final report from our readiness review in
April.  Many thanks to all the presenters for their efforts in preparing
for the review and for their excellent talks!

While the report was generally favorable, there are a few important items
that will need more work, which we will need to report at follow-up reviews
in 2017.  We'll be re-starting our Monday morning meetings on June 6
(details to follow) with a discussion of the plans to address the comments
and recommendations in the review report.

Best regards,
Natalia

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Patrizia Rossi <rossi at jlab.org>
Date: Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:13 AM
Subject: APEX ERR: final report
To: Bogdan Wojtsekhowski <bogdanw at jlab.org>, Natalia Toro <
ntoro at slac.stanford.edu>, Rouven Essig <rouven.essig at stonybrook.edu>,
Philip Schuster <schuster at slac.stanford.edu>
Cc: Cynthia Keppel <keppel at jlab.org>, "gomez at jlab.org Gomez" <gomez at jlab.org>,
Rolf Ent <ent at jlab.org>, patrizia rossi <rossi at jlab.org>


Dear APEX spokespersons,

the final report of the APEX ERR which took place on April 7, 2016 is
attached.
In the report, the answers to the charges are presented and separated into
Answer, Findings, Comments, and Recommendations.
First of all I want to congratulate the APEX collaboration for the work
done so far in the preparation of the experiment.
I was very much pleased about the redesign of the target/ladder arrangement
which is a significant improvement over the original design from
operational and ALARA point of view.
Also I want to recognize all the work done to evaluate the radiation level
expected to be generated in the hall and its impact in the equipment and
infrastructure.
However, as you can see from the recommendations (and comments)  a lot of
work still has to be done.
As it was already announced at the closeout of the ERR, we would like to
have another ERR where the APEX collaboration should answer all the
recommendations (and comments). An acceptable time frame for carrying it
out would be towards the end of 2017. In order to track the preparation to
the review it would be useful to have a meeting where Bogdan (no need for
the other spokespersons to come to Jlab) can summarize where you are with
the preparation. We can schedule this meeting around middle of 2017. There
will be just one presentation.
In the meantime you are allowed to submit your request for scheduling the
experiment.

Best regards

patrizia



---------------------------------------------------
# Patrizia Rossi
# Jefferson Lab
# 12000 Jefferson Avenue
# Suite 5
# Newport News VA 23606 (USA)
# e-mail: rossi at jlab.org
# phone: +1 (757) 269 7740
# fax: + 1 (757) 269 5800
# cell: +1 (757) 528 7606
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/apex/attachments/20160523/6bdc5b89/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: APEX_ERR_Report_final.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 142645 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/apex/attachments/20160523/6bdc5b89/attachment-0001.pdf>