[b1_ana] LiD
narbe@jlab.org
narbe at jlab.org
Thu May 2 14:23:23 EDT 2013
Sort of. They only did it with ND3.
Narbe
Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone
----- Reply message -----
From: "Karl Slifer" <karl.slifer at unh.edu>
To:
Cc: "b1_ana at jlab.org" <b1_ana at jlab.org>
Subject: [b1_ana] LiD
Date: Thu, May 2, 2013 2:02 pm
I thought that it got absorbed into eg1-dvcs?---
Karl J. SliferAssistant ProfessorUniversity of New Hampshire
Telephone : 603-722-0695
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:57 PM, <narbe at jlab.org> wrote:
Hi Karl,
If you're referring to the g1d experiment, that unfortunately got killed
back in 2009.
Narbe
> Hi all,
>
> LiD has better dilution factor and prob better polarization, but we
> decided
> to not use it for last PAC. Can someone remind me why we backed away from
> using it? I guess it was the ambiguity of how to treat the Li (=He+D),
> but
> in the mean time, I think Peter ran an experiment comparing LiD to ND3, so
> we'd be on firmer ground now.
>
> Oscar, I think you looked closely at this. Can we use LiD?
>
> -Karl
> _______________________________________________
> b1_ana mailing list
> b1_ana at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/b1_ana
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/b1_ana/attachments/20130502/7a04777f/attachment.html
More information about the b1_ana
mailing list