[b1_ana] LiD

narbe@jlab.org narbe at jlab.org
Thu May 2 14:23:23 EDT 2013


Sort of. They only did it with ND3.

Narbe

Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone

----- Reply message -----
From: "Karl Slifer" <karl.slifer at unh.edu>
To: 
Cc: "b1_ana at jlab.org" <b1_ana at jlab.org>
Subject: [b1_ana] LiD
Date: Thu, May 2, 2013 2:02 pm
I thought that it got absorbed into eg1-dvcs?---
Karl J. SliferAssistant ProfessorUniversity of New Hampshire


Telephone : 603-722-0695


On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:57 PM,  <narbe at jlab.org> wrote:




Hi Karl,



If you're referring to the g1d experiment, that unfortunately got killed

back in 2009.



Narbe





> Hi all,

>

> LiD has better dilution factor and prob better polarization, but we

> decided

> to not use it for last PAC.  Can someone remind me why we backed away from

> using it?  I guess it was the ambiguity of how to treat the Li (=He+D),

> but

> in the mean time, I think Peter ran an experiment comparing LiD to ND3, so

> we'd be on firmer ground now.

>

> Oscar, I think you looked closely at this. Can we use LiD?

>

> -Karl

> _______________________________________________

> b1_ana mailing list

> b1_ana at jlab.org

> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/b1_ana

>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/b1_ana/attachments/20130502/7a04777f/attachment.html 


More information about the b1_ana mailing list