[b1_ana] draft proposal

[J. P. Chen]

Hi, Karl and All,

Two more comments on systematics:
1) page 23, For the section on radiative corrections, to make it clear, 
add to
the last sentence, "With unpolarized electron beam, the polarized..."
2) For charge determination, it is confusing. Should not say 5%. With the
calibration of Tungsten calorimeter, the BCM will have an absolute 
uncertainty
at the level of 1-2%, and relative uncertainty (from one target 
polarization period
to next period) should be better than 1%, depending on the linearity of the
BCM response.

Jian-ping

On 5/3/2013 12:17 PM, Karl Slifer wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Here's a draft that incorporates the new material from Dustin.  There 
> is still some significant work to do, but this is approaching 
> something we can share with the larger collaboration.  Please take a 
> careful look and send me your comments.  Ideally you can send me 
> anything major this afternoon, so that I can incorporate immediately, 
> while minor stuff will be addressed afterwards.
>
> thanks!
>
> -Karl
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> b1_ana mailing list
> b1_ana at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/b1_ana

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/b1_ana/attachments/20130503/3e1edb3f/attachment.html