[b1_ana] Rates per x bin
Elena Long
ellie at jlab.org
Sat May 4 19:02:33 EDT 2013
Good evening,
Karl, you're not the only one who's been nerding it up this weekend. I mean, really, who wouldn't want to spend Friday night and all day Saturday working on rates estimates? Anyway, on to your questions.
1) I'll move the W>2 line to W>1.8. Unless you think it makes sense to just remove it?
2) The red line on Theta_e' indicates the lowest central angle for the HMS (12.2 degrees) and the blue for the SHMS (7.3 degrees). The red line on E' indicates the maximum central momentum setting for the HMS (7.3 GeV) and the blue for the SHMS (10.4 GeV). These (and any other lines) can be easily removed if they're too confusing.
3) Give me a couple minutes and I'll send them to you
4) See below (I've split it into two tables, one with the spectrometer settings and one with our rebinned x values and what we expect for dAzz and db1):
\begin{table}
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c|cc|c|c}
& $\overline{x}$ & $\overline{Q^2}$ & $\overline{W}$ & $P_0$ & $\theta$ & Rates & time \\
& ~ & (GeV$^2$) & (GeV) & (GeV) & (deg.) & (kHz) & (days) \\
%\multicolumn{2}{|c|}{$\times 10^{-2}$}
\hline\hline
%Spec x Q2 W P0 Theta Rates Time
SHMS & 0.15 & 1.21 & 2.78 & 6.70 & 7.35 & 1.66 & 6 \\
SHMS & 0.30 & 2.00 & 2.36 & 7.45 & 8.96 & 0.79 & 9 \\
SHMS & 0.452 & 2.58 & 2.00 & 7.96 & 9.85 & 0.38 & 15 \\
HMS & 0.55 & 3.81 & 2.00 & 7.31 & 12.50 & 0.11 & 30 \\
\hline\hline
\end{tabular}
\caption{\label{RATES}Summary of the kinematics and physics rates using Hall C spectrometers.}
\end{center}
\end{table}
\begin{table}
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{c|c|c|cc|cc}
$\overline{x}$ & $\overline{Q^2}$ & $\overline{W}$ & $A_{zz}$ & $\delta A_{zz}^{stat}$ & $b_1$ & $\delta b_1^{stat}$ \\
& (GeV$^2$) & (GeV) & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\times 10^{-2}$} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$\times 10^{-2}$} \\
%\multicolumn{2}{|c|}{$\times 10^{-2}$}
\hline\hline
% x Q2 W Azz dAzz b1 db1
0.16 & 1.17 & 2.65 & -0.44 & 0.15 & 0.58 & 0.18 \\
0.28 & 1.76 & 2.35 & 0.34 & 0.39 & -0.25 & 0.28 \\
0.36 & 2.12 & 2.16 & 0.79 & 0.50 & -0.38 & 0.23 \\
0.49 & 3.25 & 2.07 & 1.35 & 0.37 & -0.27 & 0.08 \\
\hline\hline
\end{tabular}
\caption{\label{RATES}Summary of the kinematics and physics rates using Hall C spectrometers.}
\end{center}
\end{table}
On May 4, 2013, at 5:34 PM, Karl Slifer <karl.slifer at unh.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi Ellie,
>
> great, I know that probably was not very easy to put together quickly.
>
> Few questions:
>
> -If your assuming W>1.8, I'd move the line in the figure
> -Can you explain what the horizontal lines are in the kin plots?
> -Can you please provide a link to the individual plots for inclusion in the document?
> -Also can you point me to the exact values I should put in Table 1 (summary of kinematics)
>
>
> -Karl
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> Karl J. Slifer
> Assistant Professor
> University of New Hampshire
> Telephone : 603-722-0695
>
>
> On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Elena Long <ellie at jlab.org> wrote:
> Good afternoon,
>
> As per Oscar's request, I've rebinned the statistical uncertainties into specific x bins. The two highest points contain data from both the SHMS and the HMS. The bins are:
>
> 0.09 < 0.16 < 0.23
> 0.23 < 0.275 < 0.32
> 0.32 < 0.36 < 0.40
> 0.40 < 0.49 < 0.58
>
> I've also changed the coloring on dAzz and db1 to black so that they're not confused with the spectrometer acceptance cuts I've been showing previously, and so the PAC doesn't get confused by the colors being similar.
>
> The most up-to-date plot including this can be found here: https://hallcweb.jlab.org/wiki/images/6/66/2013-05-02-current-best.png
>
> If you want to compare them to the same plot, but for spectrometer acceptance bins (aka what I've already been showing), you can find the old plot here: https://hallcweb.jlab.org/wiki/images/archive/6/66/20130504211619%212013-05-02-current-best.png
>
> Take care,
> Ellie
>
> --------------------------------------------
> Elena Long, Ph.D.
> Post Doctoral Research Associate
> University of New Hampshire
> elena.long at unh.edu
> ellie at jlab.org
> (603) 862-1962
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> b1_ana mailing list
> b1_ana at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/b1_ana
>
>
On May 4, 2013, at 5:34 PM, Karl Slifer <karl.slifer at unh.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi Ellie,
>
> great, I know that probably was not very easy to put together quickly.
>
> Few questions:
>
> -If your assuming W>1.8, I'd move the line in the figure
> -Can you explain what the horizontal lines are in the kin plots?
> -Can you please provide a link to the individual plots for inclusion in the document?
> -Also can you point me to the exact values I should put in Table 1 (summary of kinematics)
>
>
> -Karl
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> Karl J. Slifer
> Assistant Professor
> University of New Hampshire
> Telephone : 603-722-0695
>
>
> On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Elena Long <ellie at jlab.org> wrote:
> Good afternoon,
>
> As per Oscar's request, I've rebinned the statistical uncertainties into specific x bins. The two highest points contain data from both the SHMS and the HMS. The bins are:
>
> 0.09 < 0.16 < 0.23
> 0.23 < 0.275 < 0.32
> 0.32 < 0.36 < 0.40
> 0.40 < 0.49 < 0.58
>
> I've also changed the coloring on dAzz and db1 to black so that they're not confused with the spectrometer acceptance cuts I've been showing previously, and so the PAC doesn't get confused by the colors being similar.
>
> The most up-to-date plot including this can be found here: https://hallcweb.jlab.org/wiki/images/6/66/2013-05-02-current-best.png
>
> If you want to compare them to the same plot, but for spectrometer acceptance bins (aka what I've already been showing), you can find the old plot here: https://hallcweb.jlab.org/wiki/images/archive/6/66/20130504211619%212013-05-02-current-best.png
>
> Take care,
> Ellie
>
> --------------------------------------------
> Elena Long, Ph.D.
> Post Doctoral Research Associate
> University of New Hampshire
> elena.long at unh.edu
> ellie at jlab.org
> (603) 862-1962
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> b1_ana mailing list
> b1_ana at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/b1_ana
>
>
--------------------------------------------
Elena Long, Ph.D.
Post Doctoral Research Associate
University of New Hampshire
elena.long at unh.edu
ellie at jlab.org
(603) 862-1962
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/b1_ana/attachments/20130504/a877d190/attachment.html
More information about the b1_ana
mailing list