[b1_ana] Rates per x bin

[Oscar Rondon-Aramayo]

Hi Ellie,

Thank you for rebinning the data. From the Q^2 vs x plot I assume that you 
are combining the data from different settings that fall in the same x bin. 
It would be a good idea to indicate the resulting Q^2 range for each x 
resulting from the combinations of settings. The point is that the Q^2 of 
the combinations is larger than that of the individual settings, which is 
good for b1.

This does not have to be done for the proposal, but it would be nice for 
Karl to have a table with those numbers at PAC time.

Cheers,

Oscar
  

On Sat, 4 May 2013 17:23:32 -0400
  Elena Long <ellie at jlab.org> wrote:
> Good afternoon,
> 
> As per Oscar's request, I've rebinned the statistical uncertainties into 
>specific x bins. The two highest points contain data from both the SHMS and 
>the HMS. The bins are:
> 
> 0.09 < 0.16 < 0.23  
> 0.23 < 0.275 < 0.32  
> 0.32 < 0.36 < 0.40 
> 0.40 < 0.49 < 0.58 
> 
> I've also changed the coloring on dAzz and db1 to black so that they're 
>not confused with the spectrometer acceptance cuts I've been showing 
>previously, and so the PAC doesn't get confused by the colors being 
>similar. 
> 
> The most up-to-date plot including this can be found here: 
>https://hallcweb.jlab.org/wiki/images/6/66/2013-05-02-current-best.png
> 
> If you want to compare them to the same plot, but for spectrometer 
>acceptance bins (aka what I've already been showing), you can find the old 
>plot here: 
>https://hallcweb.jlab.org/wiki/images/archive/6/66/20130504211619%212013-05-02-current-best.png
> 
> Take care,
> Ellie
> 
> --------------------------------------------
> Elena Long, Ph.D.
> Post Doctoral Research Associate
> University of New Hampshire
> elena.long at unh.edu
> ellie at jlab.org
> (603) 862-1962
>