[BTeam] Tuesday beam studies 9/15

[Brian Freeman]

BNNT test, only "requires" beam to VL Mode to 7R.

Likely not a good candidate for parasitic testing, but could certainly be done while HC is an access.

-B
________________________________
From: BTeam <bteam-bounces at jlab.org> on behalf of Jay Benesch <benesch at jlab.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 2:20 PM
To: Reza Kazimi <kazimi at jlab.org>
Cc: bteam at jlab.org <bteam at jlab.org>
Subject: [BTeam] Tuesday beam studies 9/15

Reza and colleagues,

I told the morning and 1330 meetings that we would be taking a full
eight hours next Tuesday, likely starting at 0900.  Test plan order
needs to be decided.  Hall C would like an hour access, not compatible
with Smart Alarm test plan or BNNT test plan.  Dennis's RayTrace test
plan is compatible.

http://opsweb.acc.jlab.org/CSUEApps/atlis/task/21000 RayTrace 1.5 hr

http://opsweb.acc.jlab.org/CSUEApps/atlis/task/21151  Smart Alarm 4 hr

http://opsweb.acc.jlab.org/CSUEApps/atlis/task/21234  BNNT 2 hr

Suggested order:

RayTrace so RadCon can support Hall C entry during normal hours.

restore CW through empty target to Hall C

Smart Alarm

BNNT Can this be parasitic during tune beam portion of Smart Alarm?
      If this falls off the table due to over-run of the two above, we
simply continue with existing viewer flags.

Begin restoration to all halls at 1630, after swing crew turn-over.
Attempt to complete by 1700, eight hours after start.

Jay
_______________________________________________
BTeam mailing list
BTeam at jlab.org
https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/bteam
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/bteam/attachments/20200909/e745f05f/attachment.html>