[BTeam] M56?

Daniel Moser moser at jlab.org
Tue Feb 14 12:35:19 EST 2023


Before 1L12 HV issues, we corrected PL and had a small sample size of similar run times at 40 and 40 as owl shift.

________________________________
From: BTeam <bteam-bounces at jlab.org> on behalf of Yves Roblin via BTeam <bteam at jlab.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2023 10:28 AM
To: bteam at jlab.org <bteam at jlab.org>; Mike Spata <spata at jlab.org>; Dennis Turner <dturner at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: [BTeam] M56?

We checked that it was still within specs after reloading from december but we did not reoptimize it. This was because we were restoring from allsave.

________________________________
From: BTeam <bteam-bounces at jlab.org> on behalf of Dennis Turner via BTeam <bteam at jlab.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2023 10:27 AM
To: bteam at jlab.org <bteam at jlab.org>; Mike Spata <spata at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: [BTeam] M56?

I don't think we optimized M56 when we started in January.  I think it would certainly be worthwhile to at least check it.

Dennis
________________________________
From: BTeam <bteam-bounces at jlab.org> on behalf of Mike Spata via BTeam <bteam at jlab.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2023 10:23
To: bteam at jlab.org <bteam at jlab.org>
Subject: [BTeam] M56?

I don't recall but did we optimize M56 in each arc as part of the start-up? Might be related to pathlength issues.

Mike

--
Michael Spata
Deputy Associate Director
Accelerator Ops and R&D
Jefferson Lab
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/bteam/attachments/20230214/66b4831e/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: GP-PL.jpeg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 344427 bytes
Desc: GP-PL.jpeg
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/bteam/attachments/20230214/66b4831e/attachment-0001.jpeg>


More information about the BTeam mailing list