[Clas12_dileptons] Summary of beam charge for runs 5036 to 5419

[Stepan Stepanyan]

OK, based on this I do not see any reason to handle with 4% questionable runs. I vote to discard them as well.

Stepan

On Mar 8, 2022, at 11:51 AM, Rafayel Paremuzyan <rafopar at jlab.org<mailto:rafopar at jlab.org>> wrote:

Hi all,

As we discussed today, I added beam charge for each category, and the table below
summarizes the fraction of each non-golden categories.

* We should remove data corresponding to about 7.7% of the collected charge (runs 5036 to 5419)
* About 4% is questionable, most of them are low beam current, and hence produce high normalize rate
* about 14% is not-golden, however we should be able to use for J/Psi analysis without any issue.

<JWB4b0S0mRzx2xIi.png>


The link below, is the link to the spreadsheet where I put more detailed info for each non-golden run
https://jeffersonlab-my.sharepoint.com/:x:/g/personal/rafopar_jlab_org/EWkFPuLaOuxLikE1SCSpzF0BUhOU1S7HKPghR4M_EM_ryg?e=AF0t1F
*You should use the tab "Non_GoldenRuns"*.

Also the link to Andrey's online tool that collects some summary information for each run
https://clas12mon.jlab.org/runs/summaries/

* Maurik is working on calculating the beam charge for runs below 4930
* I am going to go to the logbook, and try to determine the goodness of runs below 5036

Rafo
_______________________________________________
Clas12_dileptons mailing list
Clas12_dileptons at jlab.org<mailto:Clas12_dileptons at jlab.org>
https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_dileptons

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas12_dileptons/attachments/20220308/1f681065/attachment.html>