[Clas12_dileptons] Summary of beam charge for runs 5036 to 5419

[Rafayel Paremuzyan]

I also think so.
Then, if no one objects, this runs will not be included in the good run 
list.

Rafo


On 3/8/22 13:17, Stepan Stepanyan wrote:
> OK, based on this I do not see any reason to handle with 4% 
> questionable runs. I vote to discard them as well.
>
> Stepan
>
>> On Mar 8, 2022, at 11:51 AM, Rafayel Paremuzyan <rafopar at jlab.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As we discussed today, I added beam charge for each category, and the 
>> table below
>> summarizes the fraction of each non-golden categories.
>>
>> * We should remove data corresponding to about 7.7% of the collected 
>> charge (runs 5036 to 5419)
>> * About 4% is questionable, most of them are low beam current, and 
>> hence produce high normalize rate
>> * about 14% is not-golden, however we should be able to use for J/Psi 
>> analysis without any issue.
>>
>> <JWB4b0S0mRzx2xIi.png>
>>
>>
>> The link below, is the link to the spreadsheet where I put more 
>> detailed info for each non-golden run
>> https://jeffersonlab-my.sharepoint.com/:x:/g/personal/rafopar_jlab_org/EWkFPuLaOuxLikE1SCSpzF0BUhOU1S7HKPghR4M_EM_ryg?e=AF0t1F
>> *You should use the tab "Non_GoldenRuns"*.
>>
>> Also the link to Andrey's online tool that collects some summary 
>> information for each run
>> https://clas12mon.jlab.org/runs/summaries/
>>
>> * Maurik is working on calculating the beam charge for runs below 4930
>> * I am going to go to the logbook, and try to determine the goodness 
>> of runs below 5036
>>
>> Rafo
>> _______________________________________________
>> Clas12_dileptons mailing list
>> Clas12_dileptons at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_dileptons
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas12_dileptons/attachments/20220308/23548f98/attachment.html>