[Clas12_first_exp] Accelerator status/Hall access/cosmic, calibration runs/meeting today at 3pm
Francesco Bossù
fbossu at jlab.org
Thu May 3 17:24:28 EDT 2018
Great plots!
If the energy loss you refer to the deviation in the bottom right plot,
I would say that before saying it is energy loss, we need to have the
alignment and geometry corrections.
Ciao
Francesco
On 03/05/2018 23:14, Francois-Xavier Girod wrote:
> For reference, we had found evidence for elastic scattering from the
> gas in the empty target using coincidence between forward carriage
> ECAL info and CVT (even with partial phi coverage) as documented here
>
> https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3517628
> https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3517631
>
> Also, those results did suggest significant energy loss for the
> protons in the central, but that was of course very early so things
> may be different now
>
> I will submit runs 2443 and 2449
>
> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 1:40 PM, Mac Mestayer <mestayer at jlab.org
> <mailto:mestayer at jlab.org>> wrote:
>
> Thank you, FX;
>
> I will talk to you this afternoon or tomorrow.
> I was not aware of this run, but it may be just what
> I need. - Mac
>
> "mestayer at jlab.org <mailto:mestayer at jlab.org>", (757)-269-7252
>
>
> On Thu, 3 May 2018, Francois-Xavier Girod wrote:
>
> Dear Mac
>
> Note that we have taken similar data at 2 GeV in the run range
> 2441 to 2449
>
> Best regards
> FX
>
> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Mac Mestayer
> <mestayer at jlab.org <mailto:mestayer at jlab.org>> wrote:
>
> Hello Lei and all;
>
> If possible, I would like to have a short alignment run with
> the torus turned off, but with the solenoid on.
>
> This would reduce our background from very low momentum
> electrons
> and should be complementary to the data we have already
> acquired (run 2467). In that data, we can use the target
> position
> as a constraint, but as I said we have a large
> contamination of
> very low-momentum tracks.
>
> An hour should give us good statistics.
> Because of a doctor's appointment, I may not be able to be
> at today's meeting, but please discuss this.
>
> regards, Mac
>
> "mestayer at jlab.org <mailto:mestayer at jlab.org>", (757)-269-7252
>
> On Thu, 3 May 2018, Lei Guo wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
>
> Steve (PD) gave us an update this morning at the MCC
> meeting. If you read
> somewhere in the logbook that the beam might be back
> in four hours around
> noon — it won’t happen. The best case scenario would
> be sometime during the
> swing shift when we could expect beam to back. The
> network issue is nearly
> resolved. However, there are a lot of remaining items
> the accelerator team
> needs to address before they can deliver beam.
>
> This gives us an opportunity for Hall Access if anyone
> needs it. Please
> let PDL and me know if you do need it.
>
> Additionally, if anyone needs special runs that do not
> need beam, such as
> cosmic runs, LED runs, calibration runs, please let me
> and the shift leader
> know.
>
> Realistically, we have about two days of data taking
> left if all goes
> well. Therefore, we must have a meeting today at 3pm
> to discuss the
> remaining plans.
>
> Let’s meet at 3pm in the counting house then. Meeting
> link is below
> https://bluejeans.com/7572697303/
> <https://bluejeans.com/7572697303/>
> <https://bluejeans.com/7572697303/
> <https://bluejeans.com/7572697303/>>
>
> Lei
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clas12_first_exp mailing list
> Clas12_first_exp at jlab.org <mailto:Clas12_first_exp at jlab.org>
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_first_exp
> <https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_first_exp>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clas12_first_exp mailing list
> Clas12_first_exp at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_first_exp
More information about the Clas12_first_exp
mailing list