[Clas12_first_exp] Validation of new DC-roads for the electron trigger

[Raffaella De Vita]

Dear All,
just for information, the new dictionaries were tested in offline as we did for all the ones generated before and gave consistent results.
Best regards,
	Raffaella


> On 06 Nov 2018, at 16:53, Mac Mestayer <mestayer at jlab.org> wrote:
> 
> Hello Sergey;
> 
> My opinion is that it would be unwise to use it before
> it's validated.  We can see what others think.
> 
> - Mac
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Serguei Boiarinov" <boiarino at jlab.org>
> To: "Latifa Elouadrhiri" <latifa at jlab.org>
> Cc: "Benjamin Raydo" <braydo at jlab.org>, "clas12 first exp" <clas12_first_exp at jlab.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2018 4:41:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [Clas12_first_exp] Validation of new DC-roads for the electron	trigger
> 
> Hi Latifa,
> dc trigger validation may take a while, probably few days, so we have to decide now
> if we want to use it. Changes are minimal, most likely new DC will work OK.
> Sergey
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Latifa Elouadrhiri" <latifa at jlab.org>
> To: "Valery Kubarovsky" <vpk at jlab.org>, "mdefurne" <mdefurne at jlab.org>
> Cc: "clas12 first exp" <clas12_first_exp at jlab.org>, "Benjamin Raydo" <braydo at jlab.org>, "Serguei Boiarinov" <boiarino at jlab.org>, "Francois-Xavier Girod" <fxgirod at jlab.org>, "Rafayel Paremuzyan" <rafopar at jlab.org>, "Raffaella De Vita" <raffaella.devita at ge.infn.it>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2018 4:29:34 PM
> Subject: Re: Validation of new DC-roads for the electron trigger
> 
> Dear Valery,
> 
> You are in the run plan. Now we are in the process of finishing the 
> Moller run.
> 
> You will take the data that you need to validate the trigger, after that 
> I would like to to take production data without DC until tomorrow where 
> we have validated trigger in this configuration with new the newly 
> generated Generated roads.
> 
> Please let me know all if you have any questions.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Latifa
> 
> 
> On 11/6/18 4:15 PM, Valery Kubarovsky wrote:
>> Dear Maxime,
>> 
>> You are absolutely right. It is not only new trigger but trigger with 
>> new DC-roads as well.
>> We have to validate it. It will not take long time. The new validation 
>> trigger is ready
>> 
>> trigger_v22_0_outb_dc_validation.trg
>> 
>> 
>> It has only electron trigger (the others don't use DC-roads at all) 
>> without DC (trigger bit 7).
>> 
>> The other triggers are masked.
>> 
>> Latifa, we need about 30 mins of beam time with reasonable current. 
>> Can't say right now what it is.
>> This run has to be cooked as soon as possible. Rafo will take a look 
>> after cook will be done.
>> 
>> We will start the production right after we will finish data taking 
>> with validation trigger.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Valery
>> .
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>>    *From: *"mdefurne" <mdefurne at jlab.org>
>>    *To: *"clas12 first exp" <clas12_first_exp at jlab.org>
>>    *Sent: *Tuesday, November 6, 2018 3:54:16 PM
>>    *Subject: *Re: [Clas12_first_exp] No RC meeting today
>> 
>>    Dear Latifa,
>> 
>>    Is the new trigger the one with DC roads with new geometry for
>>    outbending negatives? Based on which criteria/comparison will it be
>>    tested since we were in negative inbending before?
>> 
>>    Kind regards,
>> 
>>    Maxime
>> 
>>    On 06/11/2018 19:31, Latifa Elouadrhiri wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>> 
>>> We are expecting beam shortly after the machine RF recovery. The
>>    Torus
>>> magnet is set for electron outbending. The solenoid is powered
>>    up. The
>>> hall is set to receive beam to the tagger. and we are ready just
>>> waiting for beam. Once the beam is back we will perform Moller
>>    run for
>>> both HWP IN and OUT and we will tune the beam to the FC. Once
>>    the beam
>>> is tuned and all the rates are as expected. We will test the new
>>> trigger and optimize the beam current for the outbending
>>> configuration. Then we will move to production with new trigger and
>>> optimized beam current based on trigger rate and DC/detector
>>    occupancy.
>>> 
>>> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> 
>>> Latifa
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Clas12_first_exp mailing list
>>> Clas12_first_exp at jlab.org
>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_first_exp
>>    _______________________________________________
>>    Clas12_first_exp mailing list
>>    Clas12_first_exp at jlab.org
>>    https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_first_exp
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Clas12_first_exp mailing list
> Clas12_first_exp at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_first_exp
> _______________________________________________
> Clas12_first_exp mailing list
> Clas12_first_exp at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_first_exp