[Clas12_rgb] [EXTERNAL] Re: do we really need the empty target run?

[silvia at jlab.org]

Hi Bryan,
good, then I propose to wait until, say, 8PM. If no objections arrive, we
could skip the ET run, as no one really wants it.
Silvia


> As RC, whatever the group consensus on this is, I will finalise the run
> plan by end of swing shift.
>
> Removing the RC hat, I would rather we took production data from now until
> beam off tomorrow. I do not think we need empty target data.
>
> Cheers
> Bryan
>
>
> ___________________________________
>
> Dr. Bryan McKinnon
>
> Nuclear and Hadron Physics Research
> School of Physics and Astronomy
> University of Glasgow
> Glasgow
> G12 8QQ
> Scotland UK
>
> Tel: (+44/0) 141-330-7226<tel:141-330-7226>
> ___________________________________
>
>
> On 29 Jan 2020, at 17:11, "silvia at jlab.org" <silvia at jlab.org> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
> in the spring run we took 174M events with empty target, and in the fall
> we took 51M more. Do we really need to take more empty target data
> tonight?
> The only difference between the spring data and now is the beam energy,
> while in the fall we had same energy as now but opposite torus polarity.
> I am just asking this because we finally have a very very nice beam, and
> it seems a bit sad to waste 5 hours of it for data that maybe no one will
> ever analyze. Or will anyone? It wasn't clear at yesterda's RC meeting...
> Thanks for your feedback - and don't forget tomorrow's party at noon at
> the ResFac!
> Silvia
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clas12_rgb mailing list
> Clas12_rgb at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_rgb
>