[Clas12_rgb] analysis of timelines for fall RGB data

[Silvia Niccolai]

Hello Raffa, 
Thanks a lot! 
Yes, Yordanka informed me that she’s currently updating the timelines with the latest FT and CTOF features. We’ll let you know when the updated timelines are ready. 
Best regards,
Silvia

Sent from my iPhone

> On 18 Mar 2020, at 19:17, Raffaella De Vita <devita at jlab.org> wrote:
> 
> Dear Silvia,
> I checked the FT timelines. The hodoscope seems to be very stable and, a part from a few outlier, will not require much more tuning. For the calorimeter, we’ll need to calibrate few more runs throughout the range to compensate for the loss of light yield.
> One general comment: these timelines do not seem to be based on the latest version of the monitoring code that was updated about two weeks ago to address some issues with the FT and CTOF histograms that were noticed with RG-A. It would be good if next time the latest code could be used.
> Best regards,
>    Raffaella
> 
>> On 18 Mar 2020, at 13:43, silvia at jlab.org wrote:
>> 
>> Dear all,
>> I have done an analysis also of the timelines for the FALL RGB data (which
>> can be found at: https://clas12mon.jlab.org/rgb/pass0/v21.3.1/tlsummary/).
>> 
>> My analysis can be found at the following link 
>> https://clasweb.jlab.org/wiki/images/a/a0/Timelines_fall_RGB.pdf
>> 
>> Detector contacts, please give it a look. Overall, it seems better than
>> I'd have expected, given that this is the first pass over these data. But
>> of course there is quite some work ahead.
>> 
>> BAND people, please give a look at both the spring and fall timelines,
>> somehow the spring one seem not have been processed correctly...?
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Silvia
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>