[Clas12_rgb] [EXTERNAL] Re: analysis of timelines for fall RGB data

[Marco Mirazita]

Ciao Silvia,
as I expected, the channel-to-channel RICH calibration is ok, but we 
have an overall offset to be adjusted.
I would need a full cooked run for the period 11093-11283 and another 
one for the range 6156-6220.
To be checked the validity of the calibration for the rest of spring 
2018 runs.
The only bad run till now is 11301, it shows several peaks, but I can 
see something bad also in FTOF and EC for this run.
Therefor I request to recook 6164 and 11093 that were used in the past.
Marco


Il 2020-03-18 18:43 silvia at jlab.org ha scritto:
> Dear all,
> I have done an analysis also of the timelines for the FALL RGB data 
> (which
> can be found at: 
> https://clas12mon.jlab.org/rgb/pass0/v21.3.1/tlsummary/).
> 
> My analysis can be found at the following link
> https://clasweb.jlab.org/wiki/images/a/a0/Timelines_fall_RGB.pdf
> 
> Detector contacts, please give it a look. Overall, it seems better than
> I'd have expected, given that this is the first pass over these data. 
> But
> of course there is quite some work ahead.
> 
> BAND people, please give a look at both the spring and fall timelines,
> somehow the spring one seem not have been processed correctly...?
> 
> Best regards,
> Silvia
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Clas12_rgb mailing list
> Clas12_rgb at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_rgb