[Clas12_rgb] trains redefinition - feedback needed
silvia at jlab.org
silvia at jlab.org
Fri Nov 13 08:02:54 EST 2020
Dear all,
one of the two recommendation of the RG-B Fall review is to reduce
considerably the size of our trains. Due to the much higher rates at low
Q2 of the outbending Fall data, compared to the Spring ones, our inclusive
train is too big. Our trains are in total 60% of the size of the cooked
run, and the inclusive train makes up for 75% of this. The committee
recommends to scale down the skims size to no more than 20% of the cooked
files.
We are therefore planning to remove this train. If people really need
this, please let us know, and we can discuss and find out if it is
possible to find some additional cuts to include in order to make it
bearable.
We are also planning to add a Q2>1 cut to the DVCS train to reduce its size.
Please get in touch as soon as possible if you have objections or comments
on this plan. I'd like to send a reply to the committee by this evening
(EU time).
Thanks a lot and best regards,
Silvia
More information about the Clas12_rgb
mailing list