[clas12_rgk] draft of response letter to CCC from run group K

[Viktor Mokeev]

Hi Annalisa,

 The letter looks reasonable for me. Small change:
such as π-π+p, ωp, etc. may still provide enough statistics for a publication. ----->

such as π-π+p may still provide enough statistics for a publication. However publication of the cross sections for this 3-body final state requires huge efforts on understanding of the detector responses for pi^+pi^-and p, evaluation of the detection efficiencies binned over the 7D grid, location of the inefficient CLAS12 areas, development of the methods for evaluation of 5-fold differential cross sections in the blind zones of zero efficiencies and, therefore, may take significant time for the result preparation.

 Best Regards,
                   Victor   

----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Carman" <carman at jlab.org>
To: "annalisa dangelo" <annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it>
Cc: "clas12 rgk" <clas12_rgk at jlab.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 8:21:02 AM
Subject: Re: [clas12_rgk] draft of response letter to CCC from run group K

Annalisa, 

I think the draft letter makes the case quite clearly of our opinions and the planned agreement with 
RG-A makes good sense to me as someone who is part of both RG-K and RG-A. I support the 
letter as written. 

Regards, 
Daniel 




On Oct 25, 2018, at 7:41 AM, Annalisa D'Angelo < annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it > wrote: 

Dear All, 

after last RGK meeting, some additional thinking and exchange of information with Raffaella, I have put together a draft letter to answer the CCC request information, which you may find at: 

https://userweb.jlab.org/~annalisa/hybrid_baryons/RGK_response_to_CCC.docx 

In a nut shell I would like to propose that the new trigger requiring a central hadron could be implemented and commissioned as soon as possible during RGA, not to loose time during our assigned RGK data taking. RGA could take all the Spring data taking in return. 

This would optimize the overall efficiency. 

Please let me know your opinion on the matter. 

Any comment/correction/suggestion is highly appreciated 

All the best 

Annalisa 

p.s. we may discuss the matter tomorrow at the RGK weekly meeting. 


-- 
================================================ 
Prof. Annalisa D'Angelo 
Dip. Fisica, Universita' di Roma "Tor Vergata" 
INFN Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome Italy 
email:annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it 
Jefferson Laboratory, Newport News, VA USA 
Email: annalisa at jlab.org 
Tel: + 39 06 72594562 


_______________________________________________ 
clas12_rgk mailing list 
clas12_rgk at jlab.org 
https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_rgk 


*********************************************************************************** 
* * 
* Dr. Daniel S. Carman e-mail : carman at jlab.org * 
* Staff Scientist office : (757)-269-5586 * 
* Jefferson Laboratory web: http://userweb.jlab.org/~carman * 
* * 
*********************************************************************************** 




_______________________________________________
clas12_rgk mailing list
clas12_rgk at jlab.org
https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_rgk